Computerworld | Mars rover uses AI to decide what to zap with a laser Computerworld NASA's Mars rover Curiosity now has the ability to decide what targets it wants to capture with a camera or hit with its laser all on its own. No humans needed. The space agency announced this week that using artificial intelligence (A.I.) software ... Mars rover has a new bag of tricks: self-guided lasersChristian Science Monitor Mars Rover Curiosity Can Now Fire LaserSeeker NASA's Curiosity Rover now decides which Mars rocks to shoot all by itselfThe Verge SpaceFlight Insider -Forbes -Wired.co.uk -Mirror.co.uk all 30 news articles » |
Great first seasons aren't exactly common, but the last several weeks of TV have served as a reminder that great second seasons are even rarer. First, UnReal, one of 2015's most promising new shows, jumped the rails with series of ill-conceived episodes, and now Mr. Robot is threatening to follow it into the ditch. Last night's episode, “Kernel Panic,” wasn't a total disaster, but there were passages so cringe-inducingly bad I felt the urge to hide, as if I'd been confronted with an embarrassing grade-school photograph. (The line “Control is about as real as a one-legged unicorn taking a leak at the end of a double rainbow” made me want to run out of the room.) The USA network has thrown its weight behind the show, allowing creator Sam Esmail to direct every one of the season's episodes, but he's used that creative freedom to double down on Mr. Robot's worst tendencies.
Mr. Robot's first season ended, audaciously, with the suggestion that fsociety, the group of anarchist hackers led by Elliot Alderson (Rami Malek), had succeeded in erasing the world's debt records, effectively putting anyone with a bank account instantly in the black. Part of what was exciting about the show's second season was how the show would address what a post-debt world looks like, especially since there's no conceivable to way to wipe out the computerized records of what people owe without wiping out their virtual savings as well. In a medium where common practice is to restore the status quo at the end of every episode, it seemed like a radical, even thrilling idea.
Unfortunately, the primary way Mr. Robot's second season has dealt with the consequences of fsociety's hack is by not dealing with them at all. One of Elliot's hackers calls it “the crime of the century,” but apart from the fact that corporate fat cats now have to pay for their fancy dinners up front, precious little seems to have changed. People still hold jobs, Fox News and Bloomberg TV are still on the air, pickup basketball games continue uninterrupted. After tossing around a lot of second-semester wisdom about the evils of corporate control, it seemed like Mr. Robot was finally making its way into less familiar territory, but instead, Esmail's taken a giant step backward. The season's first episode featured an entry-level lecture on the workings of the stock market presented as a devious conspiracy theory, and in “Kernel Panic,” Elliot unleashes a long, sub-Richard Dawkins tirade about the evils of organized religion, concluding, “Fuck God.”
Or rather, “F*** God.” “Kernel Panic” included what might have been a record number of bleeped obscenities for a scripted drama; I lost count after half a dozen. Given that Email knew his F words would be obscured for broadcast, stacking up so many in a single hour of TV seems willfully perverse. (They're included, unbleeped, in the digital version available from iTunes.) It's a distraction every time the sound cuts out, and a needless one. Esmail seems like like a teenager dropping f-bombs in front of his parents just to see how they'll react, getting giddy pleasure from his insignificant rebellion.
On their own, “Kernel Panic's” string of bleeped profanities would be just a mild annoyance, but they're an extension of how hard Mr. Robot is trying to seem “edgy” while actually backing off the show's more radical aspects. Instead of considering how society could actually survive without credit, or adapt to its loss, we get Grace Gummer's FBI agent masturbating to X-rated (but blacked-out) online chats and Elliot scooping half-digested Adderall out of his own vomit. Even the length of the second season's episodes—83 minutes for the two-part premiere, 63 for “Kernel Panic”—feel like an attempt to assert the show's importance without backing it up with actual heft.
A show like Mr. Robot or UnReal can get by for a season on an intriguing concept and long-term promise; you overlook its flaws because it's new and exciting, and hope they'll work out some of the kinks next time around. But when those flaws persist, or even deepen, you have to be concerned that they're endemic, that Esmail really thinks Elliot's adolescent anti-establishment rhetoric is profound, and that there's something subversive about smuggling it onto a TV network owned by one of the world's largest media conglomerates. Mr. Robot's first season held such potential, but now it seems more and more like the show was writing checks it can't cash.
In a July 22 Politics, Rachael Larimore misspelled Reince Priebus' last name.
In a July 21 Brow Beat, Matthew Dessem misspelled Ally McBeal.
In a July 21 Slatest live blog, Josh Voorhees misspelled Fran Tarkenton's first name.
In a July 20 Brow Beat, Sam Adams misstated that in the TV show UnReal Rachel arranged for Ruby's father to show up on the set of Everlasting. Quinn invited Ruby's father.
In a July 20 Moneybox blog post, Jordan Weissmann misstated that Donald Trump Jr. and his father are Wharton MBAs. They both have undergraduate degrees from the business school.
In a July 20 Moneybox blog post, Jordan Weissmann misidentified Youngevity founder Joel Wallach as Ben Wallach.
In a July 20 Slatest, Josh Levin misstated the source of a passage in Donald Trump Jr.'s speech. It was from the American Conservative, not National Review.
In a July 20 Slatest, Ben Mathis-Lilley misspelled Slate writer Jordan Weissmann's last name.
In a July 20 Slatest, Seth Stevenson misstated the date of the BuzzFeed party. It was Tuesday night, not Wedneday night.
In a July 19 Foreigners, Hamna Zubair misspelled Fouzia Azeem's first name.
In a July 19, Moneybox blog post, Henry Grabar misstated that Gretchen Carlson had been the host of Fox & Friends until June. Her last job at Fox News was as the host of The Real Story With Gretchen Carlson.
In a July 19 Science, Mike VanHelder misstated that a robot was made from silicon. It was made from silicone.
In a July 19 Slatest, Catherine Piner mistakenly included a tweet by Washington Post reporter Ed O'Keefe in a roundup of conservative pundits' reactions Donald Trump's nomination. O'Keefe is a political reporter, not a conservative pundit.
In a July 18 Brow Beat, Matthew Dessem suggested that a fake Katy Perry tweet was real. He also misspelled Selena Gomez's first name.
In a July 18 Climate Desk, Ben Adler misstated that Rep. Bob Dold was likely going to the Republican National Convention. He is not.
In a July 18 Slatest, Ben Mathis-Lilley misstated that Young Republicans national chairman Dennis Cook has two children. Cook has at least three children.
In a July 17 Slatest, Emily Tamkin wrote that protesters in Baltimore were arrested after blocking traffic on Sunday. The episode took place on Saturday.
In a July 15 Science, Rosa Li misstated the number of shootings that occurred in Houston from 200015. It was 500, not 1,500. The story has also been updated to clarify that there is a federal database documenting shootings by U.S. law enforcement, but it is not comprehensive.
Slate strives to correct all errors of fact. If you've seen an error in our pages, let us know at corrections@slate.com. General comments should be posted in our Comments sections at the bottom of each article.
Dallas Morning News | El Centro moves on after shooting: 'We will not be defined by this at all' Dallas Morning News In the end, Johnson was holed up in an El Centro hallway when police used a robot armed with explosives to kill him and end the standoff. Adames was able to tour his campus ... “People could envision the future of that space rather than the past,” said ... and more » |
7/22/2016
Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
Seattle, Washington, USA
47°26′56″N 122°18′34″W
I'll be heading to Seattle, Washington this morning for the State of the Map Conference! My flight to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport will be one of the roughly 380,000 aircraft movements that take place at the facility each year and I will be one of roughly 42 millions passengers that travel through the airport annually. The facility also contains a 13,000-car parking garage, the largest structure of its kind in North America, which is visible at the top of this Overview.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Be afraid. That was the clear message of the GOP nominating convention this week. Far from Reagan's morning in America, we're now living in night of the Purge. And GOP nominee Donald Trump, giving the longest acceptance speech in history, focused on the need for more "law and order." In his world, dangerous immigrants are waiting around every corner.
There are of course real dangers in the world, but are we worried about the right things? Yes and no. We're worried about a very many things these days. Gallup polls show that half of Americans say they are "very" or "somewhat" worried that "you or someone in your family will become a victim of terrorism." But at the same time, Gallup says, 64% of us are worried a "great deal" or "fair amount" about global warming.
But if you listened to this week's convention, we should only focus on terrorism, immigration, and home invasions. This general level of fear has seeped into the mainstream. A couple of days ago, a DJ on the popular New York radio station WPLJ (95.5) said that it seems anyone can get shot at any time. That's technically true, but random shootings are incredibly rare. Yes, it could happen to anyone, but you could also get hit by lightning, win the lottery, or die in a commercial plane crash (yes, I can get nervous when a plane bounces around...but I know it's irrational since the drive to the airport was much more dangerous).
There are well-documented reasons that we humans are fearful of the wrong things (from an odds perspective). One of the best known of the cognitive biases is something called the "availability heuristic." We reach into our brains to find readily available examples, and we consider those much more common than they are. So when the news covers basically every plane crash and every mass shooting in the world, we can easily picture how we'd be next.
Politicians have taken advantage of this natural bias forever. They give us vivid personal examples of a situation, even if they demonstrate a rare phenomenon. Presidents always bring citizens with compelling stories to their state of the union speeches. Look at that single mom over there that started a successful business because of my policies. Trump is no slouch on this front. Taking advantage of our biases, last night he talked the tragic story of a young woman killed by an illegal immigrant. He just left out the part about it not a violent crime, but a drunk driving accident.
But let's go back to our general fear of terrorism. It's a classic case of innumeracy - the lack of numbers sense where small, but emotionally vivid examples, well, trump reality. That Gallup poll is amazing - for 50% of us to think that terrorism will personally touch our families is truly bizarre.
The number of people killed by violent jihadists in the US since 2001 is roughly 100. But let's triple that if we think it's too low. Those 300 are roughly 0.0001% of more than 300 million Americans. But we are really not good with numbers so we inflate the scary extremes in our minds.
Of course terrorism and national security have some unique aspects as risks go. The risks can jump quickly if, say, unstable people get their hands on a weapon of mass destruction. That's also a remote possibility, but it is possible. So obviously we do have to be very vigilant.
But if we go off of emotions only, and not include numbers and risk, we will pursue bad policies and ignore other massive and much more likely risks. I'm no security expert, so perhaps my whole view on this is moot. But how about listening to General Colin Powell on the topic? A few months ago, I spoke at an energy conference that Powell keynoted as well. He spoke clearly about not "overreacting" to threats. A few hundred people have died from terrorism in 15 years, Powell said, while 30,000 people die annually from gun violence.
But clear-eyed, balanced voices seem to be on the wane, and fear is of course a powerful motivator. When you're afraid, the higher functions of your brain take a back seat turn off and you don't think rationally. That's good on some level if you need to fight a saber-tooth tiger by charging it against all reason. It sucks when electing a leader of the free world.
We need our leaders to focus on all the big and real that can impact many, many more people, such as: the economic repercussions from Brexit; tens of millions of refugees moving around the world; deep changes in technology that could eliminate millions of jobs; lack of water in many regions; and of course the existential threat of our time, climate change.
What are your odds of being impacted by climate change? Since it's already happening, how about 100%? Of course the impacts any individual faces can be hard to see clearly. When we pay higher prices for food as droughts affect agriculture, do we know it's climate change hitting our wallets? When diseases like malaria and Zika move north, do we register that it's a warming planet that make mosquitoes more comfortable where we live? When extreme weather swamps a coastline or riverbanks overflow into a town, destroying homes, does that register as a climate issue? Or do we shrug and say it's an "act of God."
Or, more to the point of the Trump fear tour, do we see how climate change has helped destabilize regions, leading to refugee crises and, yes, terrorism? The National Academy of Sciences, among others, has linked the Syrian unrest directly to drought and climate change. And the Pentagon has repeatedly tied climate change to national security.
But even without that "law and order" reason to worry, the impacts of a dangerously shifting climate are orders of magnitude more likely than a terrorist attack or random home invasion. I know we're fighting our lizard brains to get a handle on that reality, but we have to.
Oh, and by the way, building a cleaner economy is not only a risk-reduction strategy. It brings prosperity, resilience, and a healthier and safer world. The pursuit of a low-carbon world creates jobs in vast quantities also.
I've heard so little optimism this week. I only hope we can choose leaders who understand all the threats - and grasp the vast opportunities - that sit in front of us.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Pokemon's potential for precipitating the end of civilization has been starkly highlighted as the world's major religions begin to take up positions on the game which sees grownups wandering the planet in pursuit of non-existent entities.…
Pierre Lyonet Scientist of the Day
Pierre Lyonet, a French illustrator and microscopist, was born July 22, 1708.
HFC phase-down talks in Vienna are moving forward rapidly this week as countries engage on the specifics of freeze and reduction targets and funding needs. Negotiators have delved into key issues all week, and ministers are arriving for high-level talks over the next two days. Expectations are high for more progress this weekend and for completing the deal in Kigali, Rwanda, this October.
Talks this week have continued in the problem-solving spirit displayed last weekend, when parties resolved a list of key challenges. Having made huge progress on difficult issues, countries are now focused on the core questions: the pace of phase-down schedules for developed and developing countries, and the scope and scale of funding to help developing countries adopt climate-friendly alternatives, through the donor country-supported Multilateral Fund (MLF).
There's growing support for an “ambition linkage” that pairs early action by developing countries with early and sufficient donor funding. Many developing countries, especially the African Group and various Latin American countries, are offering to move quickly provided they have sufficient MLF support.
Donor countries are on the same wavelength. The logic is compelling early action best protects the climate by avoiding unnecessary HFC growth, and early financial support actually benefits both sides: It helps developing countries gain earlier access to climate-friendly and energy-efficient products and manufacturing methods, and it saves donors money by avoiding larger transition costs that would be incurred later if developing nations built up larger HFC-dependent industries.
Among the most notable contributions this week, China offered its own proposed schedule for freezing and reducing HFCs. As the world's largest HFC producer, China has supported moving forward with an amendment for several years, but it had yet to offer a specific proposal. China's proposed timetable is slower than schedules offered by the North American countries and Island States, but more aggressive than India's (see comparison chart). None of these countries have drawn lines in the sand; all are emphasizing flexibility.
A number of countries, such as Saudi Arabia, Argentina, and Pakistan are still more cautious, but they too are ready to negotiate.
The engagement by ministers Friday and Saturday including Secretary of State John Kerry and EPA Administrator McCarthy for the U.S. will add political visibility and momentum. Ministers from countries in the Climate and Clean Air Coalition today called for completing an ambitious HFC deal this year. Tomorrow, an expanded list of countries will join a “high ambition group,” like the one that scored a key breakthrough at the Paris climate talks.
As the ministers meet, their negotiators will keep working no doubt once again into the wee hours Sunday morning towards a condensed negotiating text that will set things up for striking the final deal in Kigali.
We'll update you again before the week is out.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Marie.L.Manzor posted a photo:
Sculptor Lil posted a photo:
Sculptor Lil posted a photo:
Sculptor Lil posted a photo:
Gord McKenna posted a photo:
We had dinner in a small restaurant on the south bank of the River Thames then headed over to a plaza area on the other side of the brindge, staked oiut a spot on the seawall, and caught the various colours of the bridge and sky as the sun slowly sand. This photo is just before the end of civil twilight, about half an hour after sunset.
...
.
.
_N125224 edited
IJS83 posted a photo: