Last December CERN announced a collection of unexpected observations at the Large Hadron Collider. Scientists quickly submitted over 500 papers, each inventing a new way to explain the observations, which seemed to challenge the foundations of the long-standing but tottering Standard Model. Now, in a new paper uploaded last night, CERN makes it clear that the exciting December measurements were mere statistical blips, flips of the hadron coin so to speak.
The particle accelerator ramped up to its fastest, most energetic collisions yet in 2015, with initially surprising results. Two different experiments (ATLAS and CMS) examine the products of collisions for new and unexpected physics—each serving as a check on the other. And in December, both teams reported the exact same thing: more pairs of photons with a combined energy of 750 gigaelectronvolts than expected. No particle or process in the Standard Model could explain the anamoly of the extra photons. The proponents of a New Physics buzzed: surely the new world of the dark universe was soon to be revealed.Despite the discovery of the existence of the Higgs Boson on July 4, 2012 at the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva, puzzling questions about the nature of the universe remain unanswered. For example, the essential properties of neutrinos are still a mystery. And dark matter and dark energy, which together constitute 95 percent of the universe, are today still astonishing enigmas. The Higgs particle is unlike any other particle we have ever encountered. Why is it different? Are there more? Neutrinos are very light, elusive particles that change their identity as they travel. How do they fit into our understanding of nature? Are there new hidden dimensions of space and time?
Known particles constitute 1/6 of all the matter in the universe. The rest we call dark matter. But what is it? Can we detect these particles in our labs? Are there other undiscovered particles in nature? There are four known forces in nature. Are these manifestations of a single unified force? Are there unexpected new forces? Both matter and anti-matter were produced in the Big Bang, but today our world is composed only of matter. Why? Why is the expansion of the universe accelerating?
A similar red herring event occured in 2012 when the LHC to reach previously unachieved energies, the accelerator started up again after improvements, and ATLAS and CMS both saw extra photons summing to 125 gigaelectronvolts. Teams searched again a few months later to check their results—and continued to see photons at the exact same energy. They were definitely observing a brand-new particle. At the time, though, there remained a single unconfirmed piece of the Standard Model: ATLAS and CMS had found the Higgs boson, the final piece of the puzzle. The Higgs is a huge step toward understanding how particles acquire mass—and measured “theta one-three”—an important number that may lead to a better understanding of neutrino properties and nature's imbalance between matter and antimatter.
But, unlike the Higgs discovery, the photons announced in December 2015 were a blip of particularly interesting noise. “This is pretty unfortunate,” theoretical physicist Michele Redi wrote Wired in an email, “as it would have been the greatest discovery in several decades in our field.”
It seems likely that with the Higgs, we're seeing only the tip of the iceberg. The Higgs field seems to give mass to just some particles; others are still complete mysteries. Meanwhile, we're working to understand why there's matter and not antimatter everywhere we look. What's more, there are particles out there like neutrinos about which we are still almost completely ignorant. And then there's the elephant in the room—the “dark universe” of dark matter and dark energy.
The Daily Galaxy via CERN, Symmetry.org, Wired.com
NASA has announced that the space agency has suspended future live TV feeds from the International Space Station. UFO theorists will now surely look at NASA's move as further confirmation after a live NASA video feed by the ISS was cut on July 9th as a blurry round object was seen descending from the upper-right corner on the live feed before the screen went dark as the UFO appeared to stop and a notice followed indicating technical difficulties. The incident was captured on a You Tube video that prompted alien hunters and conspiracy theorist to think that NASA was covering up the sighting.
NASA spokesman Daniel Huot told the Daily News in an email that the camera's signal was simply interrupted. The video was part of an experiment researching how ordinary cameras function in the harsh environment of space. Huot said sometimes the cameras lose connection with satellites used to transmit video to the ground, which is what happened in this case.
"It's very common for things like the moon, space debris, reflections from station windows, the spacecraft structure itself or lights from Earth to appear as artifacts in photos and videos from the orbiting laboratory," Huot said.
The Daily Galaxy via NASA Video, YouTube, Nature World News
Image credit top of page: static.guim.co.uk
NASA Goddard Photo and Video posted a photo:
So Coldplay isn't the only one to see a sky full of stars, these are 22K light-years away
Located approximately 22,000 light-years away in the constellation of Musca (The Fly), this tightly packed collection of stars — known as a globular cluster — goes by the name of NGC 4833. This NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope image shows the dazzling stellar group in all its glory.
NGC 4833 is one of the over 150 globular clusters known to reside within the Milky Way. These objects are thought to contain some of the oldest stars in our galaxy. Studying these ancient cosmic clusters can help astronomers to unravel how a galaxy formed and evolved, and give an idea of the galaxy's age.
Globular clusters are responsible for some of the most striking sights in the cosmos, with hundreds of thousands of stars congregating in the same region of space. Hubble has observed many of these clusters during its time in orbit around our planet, each as breathtaking as the last.
bit.ly/2b85p36
Image credit: ESA/Hubble and NASA
NASA image use policy.
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center enables NASA's mission through four scientific endeavors: Earth Science, Heliophysics, Solar System Exploration, and Astrophysics. Goddard plays a leading role in NASA's accomplishments by contributing compelling scientific knowledge to advance the Agency's mission.
Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Find us on Instagram
"Our Milky Way had an encounter with a small galaxy or massive dark matter structure perhaps as recently as 100 million years ago," said Larry Widrow, professor at Queen's University, part of a team of astronomers from Canada and the United States who have discovered what may well be the smoking gun of such an encounter, one that occurred close to our position in the galaxy and relatively recently, at least in the cosmological sense. "We clearly observe unexpected differences in the Milky Way's stellar distribution above and below the Galaxy's midplane that have the appearance of a vertical wave -- something that nobody has seen before," Widrow added.
The discovery is based on observations in 2012 of some 300,000 nearby Milky Way stars by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Stars in the disk of the Milky Way move up and down at a speed of about 20-30 kilometers per second while orbiting the ce nter of the galaxy at a brisk 220 kilometers per second. Widrow and his four collaborators from the University of Kentucky, the University of Chicago and Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory have found that the positions and motions of these nearby stars weren't quite as regular as previously thought."Our part of the Milky Way is ringing like a bell," said Brian Yanny, of the Department of Energy's Fermilab. "But we have not been able to identify the celestial object that passed through the Milky Way. It could have been one of the small satellite galaxies that move around the center of our galaxy, or an invisible structure such as a dark matter halo."
"The perturbation need not have been a single isolated event in the past, and it may even be ongoing. Additional observations may well clarify its origin," added Susan Gardner, professor of physics at the University of Kentucky.
When the collaboration started analyzi ng the SDSS data on the Milky Way, they noticed a small but statistically significant difference in the distribution of stars north and south of the Milky Way's midplane. For more than a year, the team members explored various explanations of this north-south asymmetry, such as the effect of interstellar dust on distance determinations and the way the stars surveyed were selected. When those attempts failed, they began to explore the alternative explanation that the data was telling them something about recent events in the history of the Galaxy.
The scientists used computer simulations to explore what would happen if a satellite galaxy or dark matter structure passed through the disk of the Milky Way. The simulations indicate that over the next 100 million years or so, our galaxy will "stop ringing:" the north-south asymmetry will disappear and the vertical motions of stars in the solar neighborhood will revert back to their equilibrium orbits -- unless we get hit again.
The Milky Way is more than 9 billion years old with about 100 billion stars and total mass more than 300 billion times that of the sun. Most of the mass in and around the Milky Way is in the form of dark matter.
Scientists know of more than 20 visible satellite galaxies that circle the center of the Milky Way, with masses ranging from one million to one billion solar masses. There may also be invisible satellites made of dark matter. (There is six times as much dark matter in the universe as ordinary, visible matter.) Astronomers' computer simulations have found that this invisible matter formed hundreds of massive structures that move around our Milky Way.
Because of their abundance, these dark matter satellites are more likely than the visible satellite galaxies to cut through the Milky Way's midplane and cause vertical waves.
"Future astronomical programs, will be able to map out the vertical perturbations in our galaxy in unprecedented detail," Widrow said. "That will offer a strong test of our findings."
Today's Most Popular
The Daily Galaxy via Fermi Lab
Cuckoo wasp (Omalus sp.) collected in Prince Albert National Park, Saskatchewan, Canada, and photographed at the Centre for Biodiversity Genomics (sample ID: BIOUG07040-F01; specimen record: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=SSPAC1869-13; BIN: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_BarcodeCluster?clusteruri=BOLD:ACC8479)
This swirling space opera will merge virtual reality, live music, and celestial imagery from the Hubble telescope for an audience of…
Recode | The Washington Post will use robots to write stories about the Rio ... Recode The Post is using homegrown software to automatically produce hundreds of real-time news reports about the Olympics. Starting tomorrow morning, those items ... The Washington Post's Newest Olympics Reporter Is Artificial ...FishbowlDC (blog) Robots will cover the Olympics for The Washington Post | TechCrunchTechCrunch Robot reporters covering Olympics for the Washington PostThe Stack Inquirer all 6 news articles » |
Gabriel Orozco presents a fresh body of work at the Aspen Art Museum
Spanish poster for REBECCA (Alfred Hitchcock, USA, 1940)
Designer: Macario Gómez Quibus aka “Mac.” (b. 1926)
Poster source: Heritage Auctions
See more of the work of one of Spain's greatest cartelistas at Movie Poster of the Week on MUBI.
Elastic has created some of the most intriguing title sequences in recent television history. Directed by Patrick Clair (Australian b. 1982), the opening credits for HBO's True Detective (2014 and 2015) present moody montages that fit the dark tone of the series.
This video was featured in the 2016 exhibition Beauty—Cooper Hewitt Design Triennial.
Watch hundreds of videos on design and process on the Cooper Hewitt website: http://www.cooperhewitt.org/videos
The post Elastic Opening Credits: True Detective, Season 1 appeared first on Smithsonian Insider.
National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution
With the kickoff of the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro imminent, the time was right to pull out this groovy 1972 portrait from the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery. It shows the mustachioed swimmer Mark Spitz sporting the seven gold medals he won that year.
Spitz had competed in the 1968 Olympics, but the 1972 games in Munich saw him reach Olympics immortality when he set the world record for the most gold medals won during a single Olympic Games, collected in both individual and team events.
Michael Phelps, who will again swim in the 2016 Olympics, currently holds the record for the most gold medals received in a single Olympics. He won eight in the 2008 Beijing games and holds the record for the most Olympic medals won—though it remains to be seen if he can rock a star-spangled swimsuit like Spitz.
More Olympians in the Portrait Gallery's collection can be viewed here: http://npg.si.edu/portraits/olympians.
More Olympics items in the Smithsonian collection are here: http://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/olympics.
The post Let the Games Begin appeared first on Smithsonian Insider.
Kepler-186f, seen here in an artist's rendering and discovered in 2014 by a team of astronomers, is one of more than 200 “exoplanets” that researchers say lie within the “habitable zone” of their stars and could potentially have life. (NASA image by Danielle Futselaar)
Looking for another Earth? An international team of researchers has pinpointed which of the more than 4,000 exoplanets discovered by NASA's Kepler mission are most likely to be similar to our rocky home.
The research, detailed in an article to be published in the Astrophysical Journal, outlines 216 Kepler planets located within the “habitable zone” — the area around a star in which a planet's surface could hold liquid water. Of those, 20 are named the best candidates to be habitable rocky planets like Earth.
“This is the complete catalog of all of the Kepler discoveries that are in the habitable zone of their host stars,” said Stephen Kane, an associate professor of physics and astronomy at San Francisco State University and lead author of the study. “That means we can focus in on the planets in this paper and perform follow-up studies to learn more about them, including if they are indeed habitable.”
Studying and cataloging the more than 4,000 exoplanets took more than three years and involved researchers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, NASA, Arizona State University, Caltech, University of Hawaii-Manoa, the University of Bordeaux and Cornell University.
This figure shows the habitable zone for stars of different temperatures, as well as the location of terrestrial size planetary candidates and confirmed Kepler planets described in new research from SF State astronomer Stephen Kane. Some of the Solar System terrestrial planets are also shown for comparison. (Image by Chester Harman)
The research also confirms that the distribution of Kepler planets within the habitable zone is the same as the distribution of those outside of it — additional evidence that the universe is teeming with planets and moons where life could potentially exist.
The boundaries of the habitable zone are critical. If a planet is too close to its star, it will experience a runaway greenhouse gas effect, like Venus. But if it's too far, any water will freeze, as is seen on Mars. The authors sorted the planets by whether they were in a conservative or a more optimistic interpretation of the habitable zone. Then they further sorted them by size: smaller, rocky planets versus larger gas giants.
The four categories are aimed at helping astronomers focus their research. Those looking for moons that could potentially hold life can study exoplanets in the gas giant categories, for example.
The 20 planets in the most restrictive category — rocky surface and a conservative habitable zone — are the most likely to be similar to Earth. The authors have already begun gathering additional data on these planets, as well as those in the other categories.
“A catalog of Kepler habitable zone exoplanet candidates,” by Stephen R. Kane, Michelle L. Hill, James F. Kasting, Ravi Kumar Kopparapu, Elisa V. Quintana, Thomas Barclay, Natalie M. Batalha, William J. Borucki, David R. Ciardi, Nader Haghighipour, Natalie R. Hinkel, Lisa Kaltenegger, Franck Selsis and Guillermo Torres, can be read online at http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00620 and will be published in an upcoming print edition of the Astrophysical Journal.
The post Another Earth? Kepler astronomers pinpoint likeliest candidates appeared first on Smithsonian Insider.
342
The games of the 31st Olympiad are now under way in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Organizers kicked off the proceedings with a colorful opening ceremony that highlighted Brazilian history and culture, and featured messages of hope and of care for the environment. Singers, lightshows, the Parade of Nations, multimedia performances, and Samba dances were all followed by the the lighting of the Olympic Cauldron in Maracana Stadium, and the beginning of the Rio 2016 Summer Olympics.
Faraz Tareen posted a photo:
Sculptor Lil posted a photo:
05:41
Funny bikes, little plants, Dame Judi Dench and some insanely scary spiders - the opening ceremony of the Rio Olympic opening ceremony was certainly eventful.
Not that you'd have known it from the rather subdued start...
It's going to be a long night. #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/tsQ9TtbULD
— Jim Waterson (@jimwaterson) August 5, 2016
It began with the beginnings of life itself.
#OpeningCeremony gets going with a recreation of a Russian athlete's urine sample under the microscope. pic.twitter.com/iF85LLeLTG
— David Schneider (@davidschneider) August 5, 2016
And when evolution kicked in people across the world got a little bit scared.
ah lá os zika vírus #OpeningCeremony #CerimoniaDeAbertura #Rio2016 pic.twitter.com/04YpWlUXNf
— pedro rafhael (@falarafha) August 5, 2016
Who else was thinking the same thing? #OpeningCeremony #Rio2016 pic.twitter.com/eE1TJ2cJ4o
— NBC Olympics (@NBCOlympics) August 6, 2016
Just turned on the Olympics, saw giant robot spiders, and NOPE'd back out.
— Matt Silverman (@Matt_Silverman) August 6, 2016
Soon, humanity made an appearance.
#OpeningCeremony THE WHITES HAVE ARRIVED
— blige (@THECAROLDANVERS) August 5, 2016
Here come the Europeans in a dance section called “the arrival of death and syphilis”. #OpeningCeremony
— David Schneider (@davidschneider) August 5, 2016
All of a sudden suburbia sprang from the ground.
Am I the only one who seeing the similarity? #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/GJTKo26bRI
— Tommy McFLY (@TommyMcFLY) August 6, 2016
There were high hopes of who could make a guest appearance.
When Pitbull parachutes out of a helicopter all will be fine #OpeningCeremony
— Chris Stark (@Chris_Stark) August 5, 2016
He must have been disappointed because this happened.
HOLY SHIT GISELE!!!! #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/1UiwGrqi8w
— Purpose Tour Pics (@PurposeTPics) August 5, 2016
Gisele at #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/9tg2PXsTRA
— Declan Cashin (@Tweet_Dec) August 5, 2016
Out of shot, Gisele is still walking. Nobody's told her to stop. She's half way up Sugarloaf mountain. It's all she knows #OpeningCeremony
— innocent drinks (@innocent) August 5, 2016
But then the dancing started!
Shite. #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/lTqajrOanu
— Limmy Live: England (@DaftLimmy) August 5, 2016
Why am I still awake?#Rio2016 #OpeningCeremony
— The Media Blog (@TheMediaTweets) August 5, 2016
But at least the sound quality was good.
Get the same sound quality as the #OpeningCeremony by listening to an iPod through a tin can from a great distance.
— TechnicallyRon (@TechnicallyRon) August 5, 2016
Sound engineer's getting sacked in the morning #OpeningCeremony
— General Boles (@GeneralBoles) August 5, 2016
The sound is shite. It's like what it must sound like living next to Hampden. #OpeningCeremony
— Limmy Live: England (@DaftLimmy) August 5, 2016
In fact Limmy appeared to be even more pissed off than usual at the whole thing.
Shut your eyes and just listen to that shite. #OpeningCeremony
— Limmy Live: England (@DaftLimmy) August 5, 2016
ECHOEY FUCKING SHITE. #OpeningCeremony
— Limmy Live: England (@DaftLimmy) August 5, 2016
But someone seemed to be enjoying it.
'yaaaaas I love this one' #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/gEQj6SlCYc
— General Boles (@GeneralBoles) August 5, 2016
Then there was a touching section on pollution and the climate narrated by none other than Dame Judi Dench.
In my head, Judi Dench narrates every moment of my life #OpeningCeremony
— Declan Cashin (@Tweet_Dec) August 5, 2016
Global warming #OpeningCeremony thought this was about sport #moodkiller
— Dave Readle (@DaveReadle) August 5, 2016
Oh God, we're getting a tedious bilingual lecture on Global Warming at the #OpeningCeremony of the #RioOlympics ...Please, stop it.
— Tunku Varadarajan (@tunkuv) August 5, 2016
look at the dancing and music OH BY THE WAY THE TREES ARE FUCKED AND WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE and now more dancing #OpeningCeremony
— TechnicallyRon (@TechnicallyRon) August 5, 2016
We were only an hour in and it was already proving divisive.
That was one of the best #OpeningCeremony's ever. #posttruthpolitics
— Pokemom (@lilyallen) August 5, 2016
That was the SHITTEST opening ceremony ever #OpeningCeremony
— AR (@aroueno) August 5, 2016
And there was the small matter of when teams would appear in the arena considering Portuguese spelling mixed things up a bit.
Guessing which alphabetical team will come out next is certainly testing my non-existent Portuguese #OpeningCeremony #Rio2016
— Claire Phipps (@Claire_Phipps) August 5, 2016
And in the UK it was already getting late.
Question: are they classing the UK as UK or Great Britain? Just this ceremony is in alphabetical order....and it's 1am... #OpeningCeremony
— Robert Midgley (@RobertMidgley07) August 6, 2016
AND THEN THE TEAMS ARRIVED!!!
Here come Australia #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/blwf7dvYTX
— innocent drinks (@innocent) August 6, 2016
Australia rocking the Thomas Cook holiday rep look #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/x7ZOYYhm40
— General Boles (@GeneralBoles) August 6, 2016
It soon became apparent the commentators were engaged in some kind of fact-off competition with each other.
*doing olympics commentary*
— TechnicallyRon (@TechnicallyRon) August 6, 2016
"Ah Bulgaria, A fun fact about Bulgaria"
*checks wikipedia*
"He was the head womble... dammit"#OpeningCeremony
#OpeningCeremony #Rio2016 Factoids, tripping off the tongue like lead weights....
— Alastair Stewart (@alstewitn) August 6, 2016
Five fun facts about Andorra. It is bedtime isn't it? #OpeningCeremony
— Jane Merrick (@janemerrick23) August 6, 2016
"Finland. Not land-locked. Thought by many people to be home to Santa Claus, up in the North."#Rio2016 #OpeningCeremony
— The Media Blog (@TheMediaTweets) August 6, 2016
If Wikipedia pulled its website for just ten minutes, this commentary could get quite exciting #OpeningCeremony
— Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) August 6, 2016
There were a few unexpected entrances.
I'm on my way to the Opening Ceremony #Rio2016 pic.twitter.com/I9ff7CIKpB
— Darth Vader (@DepressedDarth) August 6, 2016
The Empire better win gold or someone is getting force choked #OpeningCeremony #Rio2016
— Darth Vader (@DepressedDarth) August 6, 2016
Delegação da Nova Zelandia #Rio2016 pic.twitter.com/nuj7NTOTjK
— Mordomo Olímpico (@mordomoeugenio) August 6, 2016
By now people were tired and realising waiting for all those teams to make an entrance was going to take a long time.
Me waiting for my country's team to make their entrance #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/C3nMJXUCvv
— 9GAG (@9GAG) August 6, 2016
Then we got to “M”.
México? not today #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/3hJpdUWo7T
— hir∆m (@estadohiramico) August 6, 2016
Meanwhile in London...
In case you're wondering, this is what the London 2012 stadium looks like during the Rio 2016 #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/Mu3dYDgPPG
— Francis Whittaker (@frittaker) August 6, 2016
But at least we had things like this to keep us entertained.
NOW THIS IS HOW YOU FLAG BEAR #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/66a5U3i24K
— innocent drinks (@innocent) August 6, 2016
Oh, and those bikes...
So the #OpeningCeremony went with the Saw angle & used the bikes. Still dk what I'm watching. pic.twitter.com/BmIK9oU6iq
— Nick Short (@PoliticalShort) August 6, 2016
As a gay man, I can comfortably say that these bikes are very gay. #OpeningCeremony #Olympics2016 pic.twitter.com/k1OR8bXAgx
— #NeverHillary (@ScottPresler) August 6, 2016
I don't get the bikes. #OpeningCeremony
— Rosemary Barton (@RosieBarton) August 6, 2016
Then for some reason - can't think why - everyone went a bit la la over the Tongan flag bearer.
Current flights been booked by females around the world ✈️ #OpeningCeremony #Olympics2016 #tonga pic.twitter.com/vkfH61Io40
— δεmγ (@Demidinho) August 6, 2016
Me trying to find flights to #Tonga. #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/zQhMT4fVeu
— Jesse (@ncfac) August 6, 2016
Then things took a turn for the weird when it transpired the actual CIA were getting involved.
The best thing about the #OpeningCeremony is that the @CIA has turned it into a massive quiz https://t.co/LgrMEKsm6n
— Chris York (@ChrisDYork) August 6, 2016
Celebrating #Rio2016 #Olympics #OpeningCeremony? We'll be asking poll questions for you to test your world knowledge.
— CIA (@CIA) August 5, 2016
Hint: #WorldFactBook
Of corse what we were all waiting for was the entry of Team GB and whether or not flag bearer Andy Murray was going to carry on with Brit tradition and carry it one-handed, because apparently that's a thing.
Andy Murray looking stoked to be Great Britain's flag-bearer...#OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/XdVbbBSRdS
— Sportsbet.com.au (@sportsbetcomau) August 6, 2016
Then it was time for the unveiling of the rings.
And finally, the Olympics rings are revealed... https://t.co/VU4WHfqJNT #OpeningCeremony #Rio2016 pic.twitter.com/cFCNOfvUQ1
— BBC Sport (@BBCSport) August 6, 2016
Is it just me or do the rings look like they are made of marijuana? #OpeningCeremony
— Sonja Nikcevic (@sonjanik13) August 6, 2016
The honour of lighting the Olympic flame went to...
BREAKING: Brazilian marathoner Vanderlei Cordeiro de Lima lights the Olympic cauldron for the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Games.
— The Associated Press (@AP) August 6, 2016
@AP literally who
— inquiett (@inquiett) August 6, 2016
@AP who?
— Bradley Headrick (@HeadrickBradley) August 6, 2016
But at least it looked pretty.
"Give them back their flame."
— The Simpsons (@Simpsons_tweets) August 5, 2016
"No! The Olympics have preempted my favorite shows for the last time" #OpeningCeremony pic.twitter.com/PMVGaD6Us3
Imagine the scenes if Barry Manilow does a live version of Copacabana as the Olympic flame is lit. Stuff of dreams. #OpeningCeremony
— Ollie Heptinstall (@OliHepy) August 5, 2016
Anyway, that was about it.
Wasn't as good as London 2012 though...
Vancouver Sun | Pete McMartin: Modern Love The Hard Drive Wants what the Hard Drive Wants Vancouver Sun In 2015, he created Tinderbox, a computerized robot app of Tinder that could learn which attributes the user found attractive — in effect, editing Tinder for his best selections. It proved so popular that by the start of this year, he came up ... |
New York Times | Google executive quits self-driving car project Daily Mail Aug 5 (Reuters) - Chris Urmson, who was instrumental in building Google's self-driving car project, said on Friday he is leaving the team after seven and a half years. Alphabet Inc's Google had named Urmson chief technical officer of the project after ... Technology|Latest to Quit Google's Self-Driving Car Unit: Top RoboticistNew York Times Google's Self-Driving Car Leader ExitsWall Street Journal Google autonomous car team leader Chris Urmson is leavingFast Company TechCrunch -Recode -Bloomberg -Business Insider all 19 news articles » |
Huffington Post UK | Project Murphy Is Microsoft's Latest Artificial Intelligence Robot, And It Wants To Photoshop Pictures For You Huffington Post UK Microsoft's recent Artificial Intelligence robot Tay didn't exactly make headlines for the right reasons, after Twitter users somehow managed to trick it into becoming a Nazi. But the computer giant is probably hoping their latest venture will steer ... |
The Bark (blog) | Dogs as Model for Emotional Expression by Robots The Bark (blog) The emotions expressed by the dog and by the robot were fear, joy, anger, sadness and neutral (no emotion). Both the dog ... Future work will explore ways that dogs (and perhaps other mammals) can serve as models for combining functionality with sociality. |
Newsweek | New Robot Doesn't Need Humans to Control it Newsweek artificial intelligence alter robot japan An android named 'Alter,' developed by researchers at Tokyo University and Osaka University, at a press preview, Tokyo, July 29. The android can move its head, eyes, mouth, body and hands thanks to a neural ... and more » |
Daily Star Gazette | Can Artificial intelligence, Robots, Humanoids learn ethics and morales? Tulsa Technology Time Daily Star Gazette Researchers at Georgia Tech believes Robots can learn to conform to human norms, the paper argues, through a method called “Quixote”, which teaches artificial agents to read stories that demonstrate human values and then rewards them for “good” ... |
Hiroshima Today, with some distance of time and perspective, we can think about Hiroshima with a more balanced compassion than a few decades ago. It has become possible to reflect on not only the justification for the first dropping of an atomic bomb on a populated city, but also on how that impacted the many thousands of people caught up in the blast and its aftermath.
It was a bombing American hearts decided was justified; but which minds have largely disconnected from in terms of consequences for humanity. This was evident when the current Republican candidate for President allegedly questioned why we don't use our nuclear weapons for a third time.
Next January, either Donald J. Trump or Hillary Rodham Clinton will receive the nuclear football from President Obama. Either one of seemingly the two most controversial people in modern U.S. political history is going be in charge of our nuclear codes, a certain outcome of this election we should be most concerned about.
Seventy-one years ago my grandfather Jacob Beser was flying in the back of a B-29 listening to the radio. He wasn't listening to Beyonce—He was listening to frequency. He was monitoring a device that was going to end the war. This is what he trained for. This is what he knew and was prepared to die for. If anything went wrong, he was told to eat the device's frequency code, written on a small piece of paper.
None of that was necessary. He did his job right, and he saw what men were capable of. He saw it twice, over Nagasaki too, and he never expressed guilt about it. But he, like the rest of America, disconnected from the reality of the human suffering 32,000 feet below. He, like the majority of his countrymen felt, it was necessary.
When my grandfather looked out the window, he likened the mushroom cloud to sand in the water, the way it billows along the shoreline in the tide. He couldn't connect with the children in the streets or the people as they packed in train cars on their way to work. He couldn't connect to the horrors they would witness and live with for the rest of their lives.
Can we make those connections, America? Can we stop saying “What about Pearl Harbor,” long enough to look at what World War II brought humanity to accomplish? Can we ask ourselves, “what will it take to bring us there again?”
I am not asking for a justification. I am not asking for an apology. I am asking that we listen to the stories of the atomic bomb survivors as a testimony to the evils of nuclear war.
Today I invite you to my Facebook community, Hibakusha: The Nuclear Family, where you can learn about what it was like under the mushroom clouds. I've called it a Blogumentary. It is an interactive online documentary that begs you to remember what happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. What happened to them could happen to us. Listen to their words, not as Japanese, and not as Americans, but as people.
Ari M. Beser is the grandson of Lt. Jacob Beser, the only U.S. serviceman aboard both bomb-carrying B-29s. He is traveling through Japan with the Fulbright-National Geographic Digital Storytelling Fellowship to report on the 70th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the fifth anniversary of the Great East Japan earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear meltdowns in Fukushima. Beser will give voice to people directly affected by nuclear technology today, as well as work with Japanese and Americans to encourage a message of reconciliation and nuclear disarmament. His new book, The Nuclear Family, focuses on the American and Japanese perspectives of the atomic bombings.
Sculptor Lil posted a photo:
Nick-Weedon posted a photo:
Nick-Weedon posted a photo:
foxygraphy posted a photo:
foxygraphy posted a photo:
dizzy.doll posted a photo:
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Read more: Environment, Clean Power Plan, State Attorneys General, Kochs, William F. Whitsitt, Devon Energy Corporation, Oipa, Election-Contributions, Politics News
Scientists have answered a burning question central to the charm of sunflowers: Why do young flowers move their blooms to always face the sun over the course of a day?
Moon Express has a ways to go before it can reach the lunar surface, which it hopes to do next year. It still has to assemble the lander. The rocket that it plans to launch on has yet to fly even once.Reuters:
The spacecraft will carry a number of science experiments and some commercial cargo on its one-way trip to the lunar surface, including cremated human remains, and will beam back pictures and video to Earth, the company said.
This week Microsoft delivered a big update to Windows 10 and we explored all the cool new features. We also tried upgrading ourselves with nootropic “smart” drugs, compared the two presidential candidates' cybersecurity platforms, talked with author Mary Roach, and more. Here's a look back.
Microsoft's first big feature update for Windows 10, the Anniversary Update, is out today. With it comes a smarter Cortana, better multiple desktop tools, and tweaks that fix annoyances we've hated since Windows 10 launched.
Imagine a pill you can take to speed up your thought processes, boost your memory, and make you more productive. If it sounds like the ultimate life hack, you're not alone. There are pills that promise that out there, but whether they work is complicated. Here are the most popular cognitive enhancers available, and what science actually says about them.
Two-factor authentication is one of the most important ways to protect your accounts. However, recently some authentication methods like SMS have come under fire for being vulnerable to hackers, which defeats the point of “something you know and something you have.” We decided to look at the most common methods and rank them by how secure they really are.
Mary Roach wants to you to be uncomfortable, but intrigued. Her books examine the unexpected, curious minutiae of managing the human body and the science of how we deal with our own limitations.
Every day it seems like there's another hack, password theft, or leak. Both government agencies and private companies are regularly attacked, by intruders just looking for sensitive data to sell, or foreign actors looking for valuable information. That alone is reason enough for a Presidential candidate to at least have an educated, informed cybersecurity policy. Let's take a look at their platforms to see if they do.
Sitting around a table with good friends is the best way to play tabletop RPGs like Dungeons & Dragons, but that's not always an option. If your friends have moved away, live overseas, or don't want to brave the traffic, there's plenty of ways to make game night happen no matter where your group is located.
If you've been playing a lot of Pokémon Go, you're probably tired of catching the same ol' pokémon in your neighborhood. The Poke Radar map and iPhone app help you find the rest of them so you can complete your collection.
It's hard enough to manage your money on a steady, regular income. When your income varies from month to month as someone who's freelancing or self-employed, keeping your finances organized is even more of a pain. From my experience, you need a system. Set it up once, and it protects you forever. Here's the system I use.
Sunscreen is sunscreen, so you'd think the way you apply it doesn't really matter, but choosing between cream or lotion and a spray-on sunscreen can impact the likelihood you'll use it, the amount of coverage on your skin, and even the actual protection you get. Let's find out which might be better for you in this sunscreen showdown.
If you want to add a little green to your home—whether it's green for nature's sake or green because you like the idea of growing food—you don't need a lot of space to do it. Here are some suggestions to add a little plant life to your home or office, no matter what size it is.
Microsoft's free Windows 10 upgrade offer officially ended yesterday. However, the company has left a loophole. If you need to use assistive technologies, you can still upgrade for free. Microsoft also isn't verifying if you do.
If you live in a small space, you may think your at-home exercise options are limited to no-equipment, mostly bodyweight workouts. However, a suspension system or a couple of dumbbells can open the door to tons of new exercises without taking up a ton of space or stretching your student budget.
Have some extra pool noodles around? This video is chock-full of great pool noodle tricks, including a way to spiral-cut them into padding you can wrap around almost anything.
Even if you're no longer a novice trainer, there's still plenty you may not know about Pokémon Go and how it works. When it comes to using Incense and hatching eggs, the way you walk makes a huge difference.
Electronics Weekly | IBM makes randomly spiking neurons using phase-change Electronics Weekly IBM scientists in Zurich have created randomly spiking neurons using phase-change materials to store and process data. Recommended Articles. IBM DLD chip · IBM micro-machine separates bio-particles for disease detection · IBM 5 qubit computer with ... Scientists discover a way to make crystals act like neuronsiNews IBM Scientists Create Artificial Neurons for Cognitive ComputingCDA News IBM Research Develops The World's First Artificial NeuronsScience World Report Benzinga -scitech nation (press release) (blog) all 8 news articles » |
Cognitive dissonance 101: John Edwards - MacroBusiness MacroBusiness (blog) Here's an insight into the cognitive dissonance that is the RBA Board, where it can't understand “why the economy is doing so well” yet has to cut rates to all time ... and more » |
The Guardian | How long can the cognitive dissonance between my faith and the ... The Guardian The latest allegations of abuse against George Pell have forced me to ask how a church that can do so much good can also be responsible for so much evil. and more » |
By Kate Weiss, The National SocioEnvironmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC)
Environmental social scientist Jampel Dell'Angelo and filmmaker Matteo Dell'Angelo recently co-directed a documentary film of Elinor Ostrom's last research project. Working Together documents the challenges and successes of interdisciplinary research on smallholder climate adaptation and community water governance in semi-arid areas. The study found that involvement of all the river basin actors in a participatory way reduced social conflicts while providing more sustainable water allocation in the region. The film features water competition and governance in Kenya, which is a country that is innovative among developing countries for participatory water governance reforms.
A postdoctoral research fellow at the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC), Jampel Dell'Angelo conducted over nine months of fieldwork on Mount Kenya as postdoctoral researcher at the Ostrom Workshop and coordinator of an interdisciplinary team on the U.S. National Science Foundation research project awarded to Elinor Ostrom. The film chronicles Elinor Ostrom's last research project and can be found here: http://videos4water.org/.
The Dell'Angelo brothers worked on the project alongside an interdisciplinary science team that included social science researchers from Indiana University and hydrologists from Princeton University.
Jampel Dell'Angelo has a passion for science and scholarship that has the potential to inform decisions and improve public policies. He believes multimedia can provide a powerful and inspiring means for scientific storytelling to accomplish those goals. “It's not often science makes an effort to communicate in a way that is entertaining and for larger audiences, and this documentary thanks to the involvement of my brother Matteo, makes that effort,” he says. “The film also documents the value of critical efforts to address emerging problems, such as the issues around climate change adaptation and water resources in Mt. Kenya, through real interdisciplinary research.”
Ostrom was the only woman in history to win a Nobel Prize in economics for her work on community natural resource management. Ostrom unfortunately passed away before her research team got to the field; but she was the principal investigator who received the grant from the National Science Foundation research featured in the video. http://newsinfo.iu.edu/news/page/normal/19578.html/
I had the opportunity to catch up with Jampel to discuss the documentary, the research conducted in Mt. Kenya, and the implications of this research.
Q: In Working Together, you provide a glimpse into what happens when two teams of researchers work together to gather important information on both human and natural systems. With so much happening on the research end, how did you begin filming this as a research narrative?
Dell'Angelo: It began both as a desire to keep Elinor Ostrom's legacy alive as well as a response to how, when I first arrived in Kenya, I was immediately touched with how much people were affected by and involved in managing water at a local level and how this really affected their lives. And all of this was happening in a scenery that was incredible and that had enormous ecological, cultural, and social variety. It was evident that this research was incredibly interdisciplinary and needed to account for an enormous amount of complexity. So, I thought, “Well, this is something that should be documented.”
Q: What were the main findings of the research?
Dell'Angelo: I think that one of the most interesting things we observed was that this system of community-water governance has a real impact on people and on how resources are allocated. We were working with 25 communities along five different river basins that had experienced increasingly elevated conflicts over water resources. This was really because the downstream users didn't have a voice to articulate their discontent and frustration when they felt the up-stream users were withdrawing too much water. The transition over to a community-based water governance drastically reduced the level of conflicts between different users.
In terms of the main bio-physical findings, we found that, with climate change, what's happening in the area isn't that there's less rainfall, but that the distribution of rain is changing. This is important, because there is a big difference between the same amount of rain falling in one month versus in six months. This has significant implications in terms of agricultural production and agricultural decision making. This raises questions of how people will adapt to these various changes in the future.
Q: Why is it important for both researchers and decision-makers to understand the human dynamics and climate impacts of Mt. Kenya's water governance?
Dell'Angelo: Kenya is a little bit of a laboratory in terms of community irrigation schemes and community water management—they are pioneers in this new system of community water governance that's also hugely affected by climate change, so they are on the front-line of new systems of governance in the face of climate change. Understanding what is happening in this area is hugely important in terms of generalizing knowledge for other areas in developing countries that face similar challenges.
Q: What do you want people to take away from this video?
Dell'Angelo: I hope people take away from this documentary a better understanding of the complexity and importance of interdisciplinary research when combined with local people and local knowledge. I think it is both a valuable resource for those interested in natural resources, sustainability, and development as well as for those who might be facing similar problems in their own communities. I hope this can be an educational and practical tool as well as an insight into a reality that many communities across the world face.
The National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, funded through an award to the University of Maryland from the National Science Foundation, is a research center dedicated to accelerating data-driven scientific discovery at the interface of human and ecological systems. Visit us online at www.sesync.org and follow us on Twitter @SESYNC.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Following anecdotes of British scientists being axed from EU-funded projects, one academic has revealed actual evidence of UK boffins being dumped from Euro research efforts in the Brexit aftermath.…
A runaway trolley is careening down the street, heading toward a group of pedestrians who are milling about on the tracks. The trolley's conductor is limited in her ability to mitigate the damage; she can allow the trolley to continue on its course, hitting the crowd and causing injury to many people, or she can flip a switch, directing the trolley down an alternate route where the tracks are blocked by a lone child, who will certainly die from the collision.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Sci-News.com | Elastic Electronics One Step Closer with Self-Propelling Liquid Metals Sci-News.com A pioneering work by an international team of scientists from Australia and Switzerland is setting the foundation for moving beyond solid state electronics towards flexible and reconfigurable soft circuit systems. Continuous motion of a self-propelling ... Terminator-style robots could be step closer thanks to Australian researchersDaily Mail Revolutionary liquid metals bring shape-shifting Terminator tech closer to reality (VIDEO)RT Self-propelling liquid metal takes us a step closer to the TerminatorTechRadar RF Globalnet (press release) -Daily Star -CNET -Indiatimes.com all 26 news articles » |
On a balmy Tuesday afternoon in late July, 37-year-old attorney Joshua Neally left work early. He climbed into his new Tesla Model X to drive the 45 minutes from law office in Springfield, Missouri, to his house in Branson, Missouri. He was going home to celebrate his daughter's fourth birthday.
He steered the electric luxury SUV into the gathering rush-hour traffic on Highway 68 and turned on autopilot, a feature unique to Tesla that allows a car to pilot itself—braking, accelerating, steering—for long stretches of freeway driving. It's a feature that has drawn rebukes from rival companies and sparked investigations by federal regulators after a driver named Joshua Brown was killed in a crash in Florida while using it. Although a Tesla with autopilot is not a true self-driving car, the company's technology has become a bellwether for Silicon Valley's ambition to replace human drivers with software.
Neally knew about the Florida crash and the furor that followed. But he had already ordered his Model X after years of waiting and saving, and he was undeterred. When it arrived, he nicknamed it Ender, after the protagonist in the novel Ender's Game. By July 26, after a week of driving the Model X, he had grown to cautiously trust it to handle the bulk of his hilly, curvy, sometimes traffic-y commute. “I'm not a daredevil,” he told me. “I promised my wife I'd always be paying attention.” He doesn't drive hands-free, or play Jenga, or nod off, or watch Harry Potter movies, as Brown may have been doing when he plowed into the trailer of a semi truck. He admits, however, that he sometimes checks email or sends text messages on his phone.
Neally was about 5 miles out of Springfield, near a set of interchanges just beginning to clog with merging vehicles, when he felt something coil and stiffen in his abdomen. At first he thought it was a pulled muscle. But the pain forked upward from his stomach, he said, until it felt like “a steel pole through my chest.” When it refused to subside, Neally remembers calling his wife and agreeing through gasps that he should probably go to the emergency room.
He doesn't remember much of the drive after that.
Doctors in Branson told Neally later that he'd suffered a pulmonary embolism, a potentially fatal obstruction of a blood vessel in his lungs. They told him he was lucky to have survived. If you ask Neally, however, he'll tell you he was lucky to be driving a Tesla. As he writhed in the driver's seat, the vehicle's software negotiated 20-plus highway miles to a hospital just off an exit ramp. He manually steered it into the parking lot and checked himself into the emergency room, where he was promptly treated. By night's end he had recovered enough to go home.
Did autopilot save Neally? It's hard to say. He acknowledges that, in retrospect, it might have been more prudent to pull over and call an ambulance. But the severity of what was happening dawned on him slowly, and by the time it had, he reckoned he could reach the hospital quicker via autopilot than ambulance. He also wonders whether, without autopilot, he might have lost control of the car and in effect become a deadly projectile when those first convulsions struck.
Neally's experience is unusual. It doesn't prove autopilot's worth as a safety feature any more than Brown's death disproves it. Yet Neally's story is the latest of several that have emerged since the Florida crash to paint a fuller picture of autopilot's merits, in addition to its by now highly publicized dangers. These stories provide at least a measure of anecdotal support for Tesla's claims that its own data show autopilot—imperfect as it is—is already significantly safer than the average human driver.
That's going to be a tough sell, though, to the public and regulators alike. Brown's death ignited a backlash that had been brewing since Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced autopilot in a heavily hyped, Steve Jobslike launch event in October 2014. Rival car companies felt from the start that Tesla was rolling out autonomous driving features too aggressively, before the technology was safe enough to earn consumers' trust. The skepticism intensified after Tesla activated the feature last fall, and drivers immediately began posting YouTube videos of themselves abusing it. Tesla calls autopilot a “beta” feature and requires the driver to agree to pay full attention and keep hands on the wheel while it's in use. But, despite some safety checks introduced in January, the car will still drive itself if the driver goes hands-free.
By mid-July, when a second Tesla Model S crashed while on autopilot on an undivided highway in Montana, Tesla had become the subject of three federal investigations. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration was looking into the cause of the Florida crash. The National Transportation Safety Board was examining whether autonomous driving technology was a hazard to safety. Even the Securities and Exchange Commission opened a probe into claims by Fortune magazine that Musk had failed to disclose the Florida autopilot crash to investors in a timely manner, even as he sold some of his own stock in the company. (Tesla has vehemently disputed the claims.)
It added up to a grim cloud over both the company and self-driving car technology, whose future depends on drivers, bureaucrats, and chest-pounding politicians all agreeing to place human lives in the hands of potentially deadly robots. Even Consumer Reports, which has championed the Tesla Model S as one of the greatest cars ever made, called for Tesla to disable autopilot until the technology became more reliable.
“By marketing their feature as ‘Autopilot,' Tesla gives consumers a false sense of security,” Consumer Reports Vice President Laura MacCleery said. “In the long run, advanced active safety technologies in vehicles could make our roads safer. But today, we're deeply concerned that consumers are being sold a pile of promises about unproven technology.”
I'm among the critics who have suggested, both before and after the furor over Brown's death, that Tesla had implemented and publicized the technology in a potentially perilous way. Despite its name, Tesla's autopilot feature does not give the cars full autonomy, like the concept vehicles made by Google that you might spot tooling around Mountain View, California. The first time I test-drove a Tesla with autopilot, I wrote a review calling it “a safety feature that could be dangerous,” because it encourages drivers to relax while relying on them to take over at a moment's notice. After Brown's death, I wrote that the entire autopilot concept might be flawed.
Yet Tesla insists that calls for it to disable autopilot are shortsighted. In fact, the company argues that the critics have it backward: Given that its internal testing data suggest the feature drives more safely than humans do, Tesla maintains that it would be irresponsible and dangerous not to offer autopilot to its customers.
It's a typically brash stance from a company that has never backed down from a public relations battle, and it's tempting to dismiss it as another example of Musk's hubris. Yet, as usual, Tesla makes a strong case for itself. Pressed to defend autopilot's safety record, the company disclosed to me the process by which it tested and eventually decided to activate the feature to consumers.
First, the company developed the software and tested it in millions of miles' worth of computer simulations, using real-world driving data gathered by the sensors on the company's cars. Next it activated autopilot in about 300 vehicles driven by the company's own testers, who drove it every day and subjected it to challenging circumstances. (Musk was among them.) Then it introduced autopilot “inertly” via software update into the vehicles of existing Tesla drivers for a testing phase that it called “silent external validation.” In this mode, the autopilot software logged and analyzed every move it would have made if active but could not actually control the vehicle. In this way, Tesla gained millions of miles' worth of data on autopilot's performance in consumers' vehicles before it ever took effect. Finally, the company activated the feature for some 900 consumers who volunteered to test it and provide subjective feedback. Throughout the process, Tesla says, it released updates to improve the software, and by the end it was clear to the company that drivers would be safer on the road with autopilot than without it. At that point, Tesla argues, it would have been a disservice to its drivers to keep the feature inactive.
Without taking Tesla's word for it, it's tough to empirically validate Musk's contention that autopilot is already saving a significant number of lives. One confounding factor is that we're less likely to hear about it when something goes right with self-driving features than when something goes wrong. Given that Tesla says it anonymizes its tracking data for customers' privacy, there's no way for the public to know about these close calls unless drivers self-report them, as Neally did to Tesla after his pulmonary embolism. (Neally agreed to tell his story to Slate after I asked the company for real-world examples of autopilot functioning as a critical safety feature.) Even when we do know about these, it's hard to prove the counterfactual that someone would have died if the automation hadn't kicked in.
Still, Neally's case isn't the first in which Tesla safety features appear to have averted catastrophe. In Washington on July 16, a Model S was driving on New York Avenue when a pedestrian stepped in front of it. The car slammed on its own brakes, and no one was hurt. The incident was glossed in headlines as one in which autopilot may have saved a pedestrian's life. That isn't quite accurate, though: Autopilot was turned off at the time, the company told me. It was actually Tesla's automatic emergency braking system that kicked in. That's a safety feature that dozens of other car models already offer and which may come standard in all U.S.-made vehicles by 2022. Tesla deserves credit for implementing it, but not for pioneering it.
In another instance, the dashcam on an Uber driver's Model S captured a scary close call in which a sedan suddenly turned left in front of him, at night, in the rain, with no time to steer around it. Before the driver could react, the Model S braked sharply. It jerked to a stop a few feet from the car, which it otherwise would have plowed into broadside. In that case, it appears that autopilot was in fact engaged.
Meanwhile, the NHTSA has concluded that the fatal Florida crash should not set back efforts to make the roads saver through automation. The auto industry “cannot wait for perfect” to develop and deploy potentially lifesaving technology, NHTSA head Mark Rosekind said.
It's fair to remain skeptical when Musk claims that autopilot would save 500,000 lives a year if it were deployed universally. Unless the company were to release all its testing and tracking data, which it declines to do, we can't possible verify its calculations. One of the few specific figures that the company publicized in its blog post was that autopilot had been safely used in more than 130 million miles of driving before the first fatality, which is a higher ratio of miles to deaths than the U.S. or global averages. But just one more autopilot-related fatality tomorrow would undermine that claim. The math required to demonstrate conclusively that autopilot is safer than human drivers would be more nuanced, examining injury accidents as well as fatalities and controlling for biases such as the recommended use of autopilot predominantly on highways under favorable driving conditions.
What we know at this point is that autopilot can hurt or kill people if used improperly and that it also has the potential to save people. It's also fair to assume that the technology will get safer over time as Tesla and other companies study and learn from its errors. The only question is whether the public can or should tolerate its rare mistakes in the meantime.
This article is part of Future Tense, a collaboration among Arizona State University, New America, and Slate. Future Tense explores the ways emerging technologies affect society, policy, and culture. To read more, follow us on Twitter and sign up for our weekly newsletter.
iRobot also adds connectivity to the Braava jet robot mop.
Uproxx reported Wednesday that a possibly tongue-in-cheek petition on Change.org to shut down critic aggregation site Rotten Tomatoes was attracting sincere support from fans of Suicide Squad, who were unhappy about the film's overwhelmingly negative reviews. To be precise, the petition, which now has more than 17,000 signatures, said:
We need this site to be shut down because It's Critics always give The DC Extended Universe movies unjust Bad Reviews, Like
1- Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice 2016
2- Suicide Squad 2016
and that Affects people's opinion even if it's a really great movies
There's a lot wrong with this petition, from the idea that Rotten Tomatoes somehow controls the opinion of the critics who didn't like the DC movies to the idea that a bad review should spoil the fun of an individual viewer who likes these films. But I'm shocked to report that I've found common ground with of people who believe that critics care in the slightest about DC vs. Marvel. I, too, think Rotten Tomatoes is a terrible thing for films—and not just Suicide Squad. Not because it “Affects people's opinion even if it's a really great movies,” or even because of problems with the model (a three out of five star rating is marked “fresh,” instead of “mediocre”), but because it uses a model at all. Rotten Tomatoes encourages a math-driven approach to something that is inherently personal and subjective. If your opinion about a work of art can be expressed as a number, it's not a very interesting opinion.
This is not to say that math has no place in writing about art; in fact, critics would greatly benefit from using it more. There's no music without rhythm and harmony, no poetry without meter, no prose without structure. In film, editing, shot composition, and story structure are all well-suited to quantitative criticism, to seeking to answer the question of how a film works or doesn't work. By the same token, we could probably spend more time talking about the qualitative aspects of math: Cantor's diagonalisation proof is a beautiful castle built on air; the Pythagorean theorem's various proofs by rearrangement are so grounded they don't need language at all. Our personal aesthetic and qualitative responses to great works of mathematics, like quantitative formal analysis of great works of art, can help us understand them better. But there's little value in assigning a number to how much we liked them. The interesting questions are “Why?” and “How?,” not “How much?”
There's nothing wrong with the question “Should I see this movie?,” and criticism can definitely help answer it. But the right way to find an answer is to consult one or two critics whose taste you trust, not a thousand critics you don't know. In fact, a review that talks about why and how a film works written by a critic whose tastes are completely different from yours will tell you much more about whether you, personally, might enjoy it than a “fresh” or “rotten” rating. Things don't get better by adding more voices to the din, they get worse. One of the greatest harms aggregators like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic do is convincing people that there's value in aggregation to begin with, that by asking enough people the same dumb question, a Rotten Tomato score will approach some mythical asymptote of objectivity. This is the logic that says that one shitty mortgage is a bad investment, but a thousand shitty mortgages are solid gold. Once you buy that, attacking critics whose opinions are “wrong” is an easy step to take. They're out of step with objective reality, as determined by math, so they must have an ulterior motive. The problem with the Rotten Tomatoes petition isn't the goal, it's that the person who wrote it has clearly internalized all the faulty premises the site is based on.
There's a larger argument here about the way aggregate scores dovetail neatly with our technocratic urge for assigning metrics to everything, which inexorably leads toward miserable people crying in their cubicles and collapsing from heatstroke—but it's probably unfair to lay scientific management at the feet of Rotten Tomatoes. Although Taylorism may be a garbage idea from a garbage culture, profit is undeniably quantifiable: artistic value just isn't. And from that initial category error, misery flows like blood from a wound, from fans who are genuinely sad and furious that someone is hurting their film's score to critics who have to deal with their harassment campaigns. Video game companies are even linking compensation to Metacritic scores: It looks like some kind of objective way of measuring the work a developer did; coincidentally, it's a hell of a lot cheaper than sharing profits. And so the loop of bullshit closes: The same internet hordes who attack critics who pan a big game can, correctly, say that those critics are hurting the game's creators financially. (To my knowledge, no critic has asked to be part of any company's human resources system, nor are any of them being paid for writing employee evaluations.) But in the HR spirit, here's some data-driven results-oriented analysis: The New Soviet Man this system produces is not James Agee but Milo Yiannopoulos, quantifying the value of other human beings like a deranged Nazi robot. (Not coincidentally, he's also an internet terrorist who allies himself with actual Nazis.) No thanks.
This is not to say that using Rotten Tomatoes will necessarily turn you into a Nazi. It's an aesthetic choice like any other. You can choose to understand the world around you by boiling down very complicated, personal responses from a wide variety of people to a single number. You can choose to be offended when your own response to something doesn't match the “objective” rating you've conjured out of thin air. But like any aesthetic choice, this too can be qualitatively described. So here's how I, personally, respond to Rotten Tomatoes, a website that assigns aggregate numbers to works of art. It's uninspired. It's boring. It's ugly. You can be on the side of Cogentiva or you can be on the side of Enlightened. I know which one I choose. After all, it's 86-percent fresh.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
A team of researchers in Australia used a special mapping technique to expose a striking painting of another woman under the French Impressionist's Portrait of a Woman.
The Army is currently in the process of transitioning away from their pixelated Universal Camouflage Pattern uniforms to ones with the Operational Camouflage Pattern. Now, the US Navy is following suit by ditching their pixelated blue uniform in favor of a new pattern.
It will take three years to transition to the new uniform
It will take three years for the Navy to transition to the new Navy Working Uniform Type III, which is a digital woodland pattern with a mix of green, tan, and black. It will replace the pixelated blue Navy Working Uniform Type I, which has been widely ridiculed by sailors since it was introduced. The new design will be available for sailors on October 1st, 2016, who will receive an allowance to offset the cost...
The United States throws away 36 million tons of food each year, which amounts to 40 percent of the total food generated. However, this massive issue presents a big recycling opportunity. In this short film from the web series The Perennial Plate, we tour A1 Organics in Colorado, which uses a machine called biogas digester to turn that waste into renewable natural gas.
To learn more about this series, visit its Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter pages.
Dear Politicians and Elected Officials,
Our oceans are in peril. There is too much plastic in them. Plastic suffocates and strangles marine wildlife who consume it, thinking it is food.
The oceans have far too many chemicals in them; recklessly dumped with abandon.
We have removed and/or finned too many sharks and fish. Ecosystems are in danger. We are testing the oceans' ability to sustain life.
Carbon, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions are released into the atmosphere daily from transportation, energy, agriculture, and animal agriculture. These emissions not only affect global temperatures and the atmosphere, they also affect the pH of the oceans, and the ecosystems that existed long before humans came along.
Look, I know you're busy working on other important issues. I know you've been working on issues of "green energy," endangered species protections, and transportation improvements. But, what about the oceans? Over the years, most of your focus has been directed towards land, land animals, and fossil fuels.
I get it, we live on land, we understand land. Yet, even here, we are "missing the boat." After all, there are only 25,000 Rhinos left, and elephants are brutally murdered every 15 minutes! I get it. Something's gotta give.
But, moving forward, I do ask; please spend as much time and effort on our oceans; rather, more time! They sure do seem to get the short shrift.
FACTS ABOUT OUR OCEANS:
Did you know that our oceans cover 70% of the earths surface? Did you know that the oceans account for 90% of all habitable space on earth? Yet, did you know that less than 1% of our oceans are currently protected?
The oceans absorb nearly 50% of the carbon we emit, and produce nearly 50% of Earth's oxygen.
The oceans give us air to breathe, and water to drink (though indirectly.) We have removed more than 80-90% of our large fish. Many whale populations remain threatened and still hunted by some (Japan, Iceland, Norway, Faroe Islands).
We have dumped agricultural wastes, chemicals, and pollution into our oceans, creating dead zones where marine-life cannot live! These chemicals have
also affected marine-animals ability to reproduce!
Instead, we need to spend more effort, time, resources, and conservation dollars to protect this most vital of ALL resources. We need to protect the
oceans; or, at the very least, think about them and act on them, as much as we do our lands and the animals that live there. Protecting only 1% of our
oceans is NOT enough.
In fact, we need to do BETTER! Both on land, and in the oceans!
We lose more and more species every year. There will be more plastic than fish in the oceans by 2048.
The reason I set out to write this letter to you is because, in 2048, my son will be my current age. But I fear the planet will not look as it does today, at my current age.
I fear we will lose the life-support system that our oceans provide us. I fear we will lose too many species.
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
As an elected official, you can work towards policies and guidelines that protect our oceans by:
If we want the oceans to survive and protect the livelihoods of the billions of people who depend on them for food, money, life, and climate stability, you, our elected officials, must do more to help now.
I would gladly fill your seat, in congress or the senate or in local government, and work on plans to save our oceans, and our planet. But, since it will likely take me many years to get into your seat, I implore you, do something, do it now. Protect our oceans and wildlife. Don't wait another moment. That moment may be too late.
Thank you, and respectfully,
Dana Ellis Hunnes PhD, MPH, RD
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
photo fiddler posted a photo:
as thousands of migrating semipalmated sandpipers eat mud shrimp on their only stop on a 4000 km migration from the Artic to South America.
photo fiddler posted a photo:
at Evangeline Beach near Grand Pre
photo fiddler posted a photo:
Semipalmated sandpipers
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Read more: Clean Energy, Climate Change, Climate Change Denial, Democratic Convention, Democrats, Donald Trump, Economy, Energy, Environment, Fossil Fuels, Global Warming, Global Warming Deniers, Green News, Green News Report, Oil, Regulation, Renewable Energy, Republican Convention, Republican Party, Republicans, Video, Enbridge, Pipeline, Oil Spill, Kalamazoo Oil Spill, Flint Water Crisis, Voting, Hillary Clinton, Green News
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Read more: Climate Change, Environment, Drought, Extreme Weather, Global Warming, Sustainability, Energy, Energy Efficiency, Nature, Science, Technology, Technologie, Green Technology, Technology News, Climate Change Denial, Climate, Climate Science, Climate-Change, Obama, Green Energy, Clean Energy, Renewable Energy, Natural Gas, Wind Power, Solar Power, Fossil Fuels, Heat Waves, Congress, Voting, Weather, Business, Business News, Corporations, Economy, Climate Change Solutions, Greenhouse Gases, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Carbon Emissions, Food, Water, Coal, Fracking, Oil, Agriculture, Crops, Rising Sea Levels, Insurance, Pollution, Wildlife, Transportation, Transports, Transport, Cities, Deforestation, Jobs, Natural Disasters, Population, Population Growth, Overpopulation, Oceans, President Obama, Barack Obama, Epa, Nasa, Noaa, Department of Energy, Republicans, Gop, Democrats, Animals, Cute Animals, Fish, Birds, Activism, Political Activism, Humor, Alaska, California, Colorado, Minnesota, Mississippi, Utah, Paris, New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, United Nations, United Kingdom, England, Australia, Britain, Canada, China, Europe, European Union, France, Denmark, India, Asia, Africa, Tanzania, Nigeria, Peru, Russia, Siberia, Children, Babies, Children'S Health, Kids, Human Health, Health, Education, Air Pollution, Seafood, Shell, Donald Trump, Soil, Art, Cartoons, Elon Musk, Wal-Mart, Cars, Tobacco, Tesla, Solarcity, Green News
Nick Scobel posted a photo:
Crocodylus acutus
A pair of recent hatchlings take their first steps into the world in a remote estuary of Florida Bay in south Florida. Because of long term conservation efforts, this species was downgraded from Endangered to Threatened on the Endangered Species list in 2007. Today, more than 1,500 wild crocs are estimated to inhabit south Florida. Long term conservation and management plans are essential for the long term survival of this species moving forward.
Waterford_Man posted a photo:
Over The Shard
Thanks for all the views, Please check out my other photos and albums.
Scenes from Rio as the Olympics are set to begin, wildfires in Greece, horses at a McDonald's Drive-thru in Spain, the Wacken Open Air festival in Germany, fireflies in Mexico, a bear atop a New Mexico garbage truck, and much more.
DaveLevy posted a photo:
the clouds come in
The Collecting Traveler posted a photo:
The Collecting Traveler posted a photo:
This story originally appeared on the Conversation and is reproduced here with permission.
A report published in May from researchers at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine claims that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the U.S., behind only heart disease and cancer.
According to the researchers, medical errors account for 251,454 U.S. deaths each year—and they regard this figure as an underestimate.
That's the sort of finding that makes headlines. Indeed, you might have read about this report in the newspaper or even seen it reported on the evening news.
But as we'll argue, the methods the researchers used to draw this conclusion are flawed, and that means the conclusion that medical error is the third leading cause of death is highly questionable.
When a report like this gets broad media coverage, it can foster unwarranted mistrust of medicine, which could prevent people from seeking needed care—a concern for everyone who takes care of patients.
A medical error can be defined as a decision or action that results in patient harm, one that experts agree should have been made differently given the information available at the time. But applying such a definition in reviewing patient records is fraught with difficulty.
The study's authors argue that death certificates should be redesigned to recognize that more deaths are attributable to medical error. That's a reasonable suggestion. But the implication of many media reports that these findings prove hundreds of thousands of people are dying each year due to medical errors is highly problematic.
First, the authors of the Johns Hopkins report did not collect any new data. Instead, they based their conclusions on studies performed by other authors. There is nothing wrong with that, in principle.
But in this case, the results are highly misleading because they are based on large extrapolations from very small data sets: The authors based their conclusions on four studies that included a total of only 35 deaths attributable to medical error—out of nearly 4,000 hospital admissions. Extrapolating from 35 deaths to a population of 320 million is quite a leap.
In addition, these studies frequently do a poor job of distinguishing between adverse events and errors. They are not the same thing.
An adverse event is defined as any undesirable outcome after a drug or treatment is administered to a patient. Every medical test and therapy, from antibiotics to surgery, is associated with some risk of an adverse outcome. Adverse events can include death, although that is rare. While every adverse outcome is regrettable, it does not prove that an error was made—that based on what was known at the time, a medical professional should have made a different decision or acted in a different way.
Physicians typically cannot know in advance which patients will experience such reactions, so attributing such deaths to error is misleading.
There is another problem with the Hopkins report: Two of the four studies it draws on use Medicare data, which generally include patients advanced in years, in relatively poor health, and being treated in the hospital. Sad to say, many such patients are at substantially increased risk of death to begin with. Many will die during their hospitalization no matter how well they are cared for. To attribute such deaths to error is to fail to account for the inevitability of death.
In fact, one of the studies on which the Hopkins report is based even includes a prominent correction factor. The author estimates the number of deaths due to medical error at 210,000. Then, based on the fact that the tools used to identify errors are imperfect, the author chooses to double his estimate of the number of deaths due to error to 420,000.
The sort of medical chart review used in these studies is radically different from caring for patients. The uncertainty and stress associated with caring for the very sickest patients are often invisible to hindsight. Seriously adverse patient outcomes are associated with a greater tendency to blame someone. When a patient has died, we want someone to be responsible even if every action taken appeared justifiable at the time.
This isn't the first study to try to assess how often medical errors can lead to death. Other studies paint a very different picture of the number of deaths attributable to error.
In one study responding to claims of very high death rates due to medical error, physicians reviewed 111 deaths in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals by attempting to determine whether such deaths were preventable with “optimal care.” VA patients are generally older and sicker than the U.S. population, and thus somewhat comparable to studies based on Medicare data. Also, by using “optimal care,” the study may catch even more deaths than the “medical error” standards, resulting in a tendency to overestimate the number of deaths due to error.
At first, the researchers estimated that 23 percent of deaths could have been prevented. But when they were asked whether patients could have left the hospital alive, this number dropped to 6 percent. Finally, when the additional criterion of “3 months of good cognitive health after discharge” was added, the number dropped to 0.5 percent. Preventable deaths should be viewed in context, and there is a big difference between preventing death and restoring good health.
Applying the rates from the VA study to U.S. hospital admission data, medical error would drop down to No. 7 of the top 10 causes of death in the United States. Applying the additional criterion of three months of good cognitive health, medical error would not even rank in the top 20. Of course, doing so runs the same risks as the Johns Hopkins study; namely, extrapolating from a small study to the entire U.S. population.
To produce a truly balanced account of medicine's role in causing death, it would be necessary to account not only for the risks but also the benefits of medical care. Many patients with heart disease, cancer ,and diabetes whose deaths such studies attribute to medical error would not even be alive in the first place without medical treatment, where its benefits vastly outweigh its risks.
Looking at medicine from this point of view, we are fortunate to be living in an era of unsurpassed medical capabilities, when the profession is doing more to promote health and prolong life than at any time in the past.
Perhaps the strongest evidence that such studies overestimate the role of medical error is that the fact that, when causes of death are ranked by authoritative organizations such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, medical error is not even included in the top 10. Would adding medical error to death certificates change this? We doubt it.
There is no doubt that mistakes occur in medicine every day, and if we take appropriate steps, error rates can be reduced. But inflated estimates of the number of deaths associated with error do nothing to advance understanding and may in fact make many patients more reluctant to seek care when they need it. A blinkered focus on error without corresponding accounts of medicine's benefits contributes to a distorted understanding of medicine's role in health and disease.
Nick Scobel posted a photo:
Crocodylus acutus
A hatchling explores a mangrove estuary on a remote key in south Florida.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
While grocery shopping one day, I realized I'd spent close to 30 minutes just in the produce section, meticulously choosing the best-looking apples, bananas that were ripe, but not spotted, ears of corn with perfectly aligned kernels. I admit, I'm picky about my produce. But I bet I'm not the only one that rejects the slightest bruise, blemish or mark on my fruits and veggies.
How did we get this way? Could it be because we are living in a society where everything is filtered, where beauty is rewarded, where supermarkets reject foods that don't adhere to a certain standard, where everything is shiny and bright?
I've also seen how my pursuit of perfect produce has impacted my kids. When I pack their lunches, I make sure to include the plumpest tomatoes, crispest blueberries, cucumbers without any dents or scratches. But one day when my daughter refused to eat an avocado that was turning slightly brown, I knew I had to change my ways. I realized I was unconsciously raising my children to accept society's norms of perfection and that these perceptions can have a devastating impact on our environment.
In the U.S, up to 40 percent of food produced is wasted every year. Most of this waste ends up in landfills that create dangerous greenhouse gases. Around 20 percent of food waste is produced directly at the farm because this so-called ugly food may not meet certain cosmetic standards set by grocery stores, yet are still perfectly consumable. Meanwhile, 48 million Americans live in food-insecure households.
On a recent night in San Francisco, I attended a dinner party to raise awareness about this growing problem. The event was called the Salvage Supperclub and it is the brainchild of food waste activist Josh Treuhaft, who decided to create a unique, immersive experience as a conversation starter around food waste. It was an intimate gathering of 16 people dining on a table made from reclaimed wood, all within a cleared-out dumpster. The chef, Pesha Perlsweig, prepared a six course meal with food that would have otherwise gone to waste.
Perlsweig sourced some of the evening's ingredients from Imperfect Produce, a delivery subscription service that specifically sells “ugly” fruits and vegetables. Boxes of produce might contain organic crooked carrots or knobbly sweet potatoes for 30 to 50 percent of the price that one might pay at a traditional market.
I was blown away by Perlsweig's creative dishes made from food the industry considers trash including stuffed wilted kale, ugly eggplant and squash ratatouille, and a delectable banana doughnut made from the actual peel of a banana. Before each course, Perlsweig offered guests tidbits and tips about how we can reduce our food waste. Did you know that if you cut off the end of a limp carrot or celery stalk and place it in water it will become firm again?
After the evening's dinner, I became inspired to rethink the way I shop for and consume food, to embrace the imperfect, the ugly, the unique. My actions have inspired my daughter to think differently as well. One morning, while she was helping prepare her school lunch, I noticed her choosing a handful of cherry tomatoes with slight blemishes. “They're special,” she said.
Here's hoping these small changes in our perception might make a big impact on our world.
Watch more of Laura Ling's reports on Seeker. Follow her on Twitter @lauraling.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Read more: Climate Change, Energy, Renewable Energy, New York, California, Clean Power Plan, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Environment, Pollution, Green News
dptro posted a photo:
Sumatran Tiger habitat were pushed away by oil palm plantation and poacher.
Read more: Democratic Party, Republican Party, Energy, Environment, The Atlantic, The Washington Post, Hillary Clinton Campaign, Joan Michelson, Politics News
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Many liquid soaps labeled antibacterial contain triclosan, a synthetic compound, specifically a phenylether or chlorinated bisphenol. While the US FDA classifies it as a Class III drug, i.e., a compound with high solubility and low permeability, triclosan is also a pesticide. Triclocarban is another common chemical found in antibacterial soaps. Many of the concerns about triclosan also apply to triclocarban (1).
Since it appeared on the scene in 1972, triclosan has steadily permeated through the consumer landscape such that it's practically ubiquitous today (see lists below from 1 and 2).
Triclosan is so ubiquitous it's even found embedded in medical devices such as catheters and sutures to prevent infections (3).
As for its beneficial effects, a 2015 study compared the bactericidal effects of plain versus triclosan-containing soaps in conditions that mimic hand washing, and found no difference in their ability to reduce bacterial numbers during a 20-second exposure (4). In other words, dubious benefit when used for routine hand washing under normal circumstances, i.e., only washing hands for a few seconds. After all, most of us don't scrub as though preparing to do surgery every time we wash our hands.
How Triclosan Inhibits/Kills Microbes
In vitro studies show triclosan can stop bacteria growing at low concentrations (bacteriostatic), and kill them at high concentrations (bactericidal). It also has some activity against some fungi (5) and even parasites such as those that cause malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, and toxoplasmosis, Toxoplasma gondii (6).
Triclosan is able to target many different types of bacteria by blocking the active site for an enzyme essential for bacterial fatty acid biosynthesis (7, 8). Blocking the enzyme enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase, triclosan prevents bacteria from synthesizing fatty acids, which they need for their cell membranes and for reproduction.
Problems With Triclosan
I. Triclosan selects for antibiotic resistance
As widespread triclosan use increased, labs increasingly started finding cross-resistance to antibiotics. Under selection pressure from triclosan, bacteria mutate to develop resistance mechanisms to it, which end up bestowing antibiotic resistance as well. In other words, studies show triclosan selects for antibiotic resistance (see table below from 9).
II. Discharged widely into the environment, triclosan can affect biomass such as algae and bacterial communities
Since it's widely used in such a diverse array of products, triclosan ends up in soil, ground water, and municipal wastewater treatment plants. Such plants require proper functioning of microbes to break down sewage. Triclosan can inhibit methane production in wastewater plant anaerobic digesters as well as select for multi-drug resistance in such bacterial communities (10). Triclosan's effects persist even beyond because it's discharged from wastewater treatment plants as effluent. Certain algae species in the vicinity of such plants have been found to be very sensitive to triclosan (11, 12). Triclosan also affects bacterial communities in rivers (13). Potential environmental risk of triclosan becomes even more relevant in areas of water scarcity where it doesn't get sufficiently diluted.
III. Triclosan can alter gut microbiota in fishes and rodents, potentially alter human microbiota, and even promote tumors in rodents
IV. Triclosan can disrupt hormonal function
Triclosan was found to disrupt thyroid hormone-associated gene expression and altered the rate of frog metamorphosis (19). It could also disrupt thyroid (20, 21), estrogen (22), and testosterone (23) function in rats.
V. Triclosan bans
Given the increasing litany of concerns about triclosan's deleterious effects on the physiology of a wide variety of species, which may also increasingly include humans, several governments are either considering banning it or have already done so.
Bibliography
1. Dhillon, Gurpreet Singh, et al. "Triclosan: current status, occurrence, environmental risks and bioaccumulation potential." International journal of environmental research and public health 12.5 (2015): 5657-5684. Triclosan: Current Status, Occurrence, Environmental Risks and Bioaccumulation Potential
2. Alliance for the Prudent Use of Antibiotics. "Triclosan." White Paper prepared by the Alliance for the Prudent Use of Antibiotics (APUA) (2011). http://emerald.tufts.edu/med/apu...
3. Stickler, David James, G. Ll Jones, and Allan Denver Russell. "Control of encrustation and blockage of Foley catheters." The Lancet 361.9367 (2003): 1435-1437. http://carambola.usc.edu/Biofilm...
4. Kim, S. A., et al. "Bactericidal effects of triclosan in soap both in vitro and in vivo." Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2015): dkv275.
5. Vischer, W. A., and J. Regös. "Antimicrobial spectrum of Triclosan, a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent for topical application." Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene. Erste Abteilung Originale. Reihe A: Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Parasitologie 226.3 (1974): 376.
6. McLeod, Rima, et al. "Triclosan inhibits the growth of Plasmodium falciparum and Toxoplasma gondii by inhibition of Apicomplexan Fab I." International journal for parasitology 31.2 (2001): 109-113. https://www.researchgate.net/pro...
7. McMurry, Laura M., Margret Oethinger, and Stuart B. Levy. "Triclosan targets lipid synthesis." Nature 394.6693 (1998): 531-532.
8. Levy, Colin W., et al. "Molecular basis of triclosan activity." Nature 398.6726 (1999): 383-384.
9. Schweizer, Herbert P. "Triclosan: a widely used biocide and its link to antibiotics." FEMS microbiology letters 202.1 (2001): 1-7. http://femsle.oxfordjournals.org...
10. McNamara, Patrick J., Timothy M. LaPara, and Paige J. Novak. "The impacts of triclosan on anaerobic community structures, function, and antimicrobial resistance." Environmental science & technology 48.13 (2014): 7393-7400. https://www.researchgate.net/pro...
11. Reiss, Richard, et al. "An ecological risk assessment for triclosan in lotic systems following discharge from wastewater treatment plants in the United States." Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21.11 (2002): 2483-2492.
12. Lawrence, J. R., et al. "Resilience and recovery: The effect of triclosan exposure timing during development, on the structure and function of river biofilm communities." Aquatic Toxicology 161 (2015): 253-266. https://www.researchgate.net/pro...
13. Ricart, Marta, et al. "Triclosan persistence through wastewater treatment plants and its potential toxic effects on river biofilms." Aquatic Toxicology 100.4 (2010): http://www.clipmedia.net/galera/...
14. Narrowe, Adrienne B., et al. "Perturbation and restoration of the fathead minnow gut microbiome after low-level triclosan exposure." Microbiome 3.1 (2015): 1. Microbiome
15. Hu, Jianzhong, et al. "Effect of postnatal low-dose exposure to environmental chemicals on the gut microbiome in a rodent model." Microbiome 4.1 (2016): 1. Microbiome
16. Poole, Angela C., et al. "Crossover Control Study of the Effect of Personal Care Products Containing Triclosan on the Microbiome." mSphere 1.3 (2016): e00056-15. http://msphere.asm.org/content/m...
17. Syed, Adnan K., et al. "Triclosan promotes Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization." MBio 5.2 (2014): e01015-13. Triclosan Promotes Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization
18. Yueh, Mei-Fei, et al. "The commonly used antimicrobial additive triclosan is a liver tumor promoter." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111.48 (2014): 17200-17205. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/...
19. Veldhoen, Nik, et al. "The bactericidal agent triclosan modulates thyroid hormone-associated gene expression and disrupts postembryonic anuran development." Aquatic Toxicology 80.3 (2006): 217-227. https://www.researchgate.net/pro...
20. Crofton, Kevin M., et al. "Short-term in vivo exposure to the water contaminant triclosan: evidence for disruption of thyroxine." Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 24.2 (2007): 194-197. https://www.researchgate.net/pro...
21. Zorrilla, Leah M., et al. "The effects of triclosan on puberty and thyroid hormones in male Wistar rats." Toxicological Sciences 107.1 (2009): 56-64. The Effects of Triclosan on Puberty and Thyroid Hormones in Male Wistar Rats
22. Stoker, Tammy E., Emily K. Gibson, and Leah M. Zorrilla. "Triclosan exposure modulates estrogen-dependent responses in the female wistar rat." Toxicological Sciences (2010): kfq180. Triclosan exposure modulates estrogen-dependent responses in the female Wistar rat
23. Kumar, Vikas, et al. "Alteration of testicular steroidogenesis and histopathology of reproductive system in male rats treated with triclosan." Reproductive Toxicology 27.2 (2009): 177-185.
24. SF 2192 Status in the Senate for the 88th Legislature (2013
25. Kuehn, Bridget M. "FDA pushes makers of antimicrobial soap to prove safety and effectiveness." JAMA 311.3 (2014): 234-234.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Durham University quantum physicists have been funded to run a Skyrmion Project involving other British universities, which, among other aims, could mean less electricity was needed to power the world.…
Engineers at the University of Bristol have applied the traditional Japanese art of Kirigami - where paper is folded and cut to construct intricate models - to create a new shape-changing metamaterial.…
Author's account of returning to the wilds of the Orkneys following personal disaster in London wins unanimous acclaim from judges
The Outrun, Amy Liptrot's account of reconnecting with nature in Orkney after leaving a troubled life in London, has won this year's Wainwright for the best UK nature and travel writing.
The Outrun saw off five other acclaimed examples of the boom genre including Common Ground by Rob Cowen, The Fish Ladder by Katharine Norbury, A Shepherd's Life by James Rebanks, Landmarks by Robert Macfarlane and The Moth Snowstorm by Michael McCarthy.
Related: 'In stressed times, we can take comfort in wildlife': why nature-writing is 'exploding'
Continue reading...Jacques Boucher de Perthes Scientist of the Day
Jacques Boucher de Crèvecoeur de Perthes, a French customs official and amateur antiquarian, died Aug. 5, 1868, at the age of 79.
In any political campaign season, fidelity to facts is often sacrificed for the persuasiveness of propaganda. In this campaign season of roiling discontent, that is only all the more so. In particular, the identification of every act of terrorism or violence as a systemic failure of the current power structure is as specious as it is seductive. Preventive Medicine can lend some very relevant perspective.
As a board certified Preventive Medicine specialist, I know full well the major liability of my field. No one gets much credit for what doesn't happen.
There are no tears of gratitude from family members because father or mother, sister or brother did not have a heart attack. There are no cards on your office wall expressing abiding thanks for the stroke that never occurred. No crayon drawings of adulation from children who grow up without type 2 diabetes because of some policy or program. There are no philanthropists eager to support you in any way you ask because you saved their life, or the life of someone they love. Perhaps you did just that, but if you did, they certainly don't know it happened, and you may not even know it yourself.
Such is the thanklessness of prevention, but it's a price well worth paying. The field of Preventive Medicine has brought us cancer screening programs that save thousands upon thousands of lives, and immunizations that save millions. Luminaries in this field are why we need no longer fear such one-time ubiquitous perils as smallpox, and polio. And, of course, in the modern era the relevant efforts continue to address immunization and infectious disease, cancer screening and interdiction, while shifting ever more to an emphasis on lifestyle as medicine in the prevention of cardiometabolic and other chronic, degenerative diseases.
There is a direct analogy between such efforts and their often-unrecognized utility, and the work of homeland security, with all of its reverberations into the current, noisome political campaigns.
Let's revisit immunization. You have surely heard the false contention that vaccines cause autism, and have likely been tempted to believe it. You have doubtless heard the true indictments of the 1976 swine flu vaccine, one tainted batch of which caused cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome. But can you say how many lives have been saved with the MMR vaccine, or the flu vaccine? Can you even hazard at a guess at the ratio of infections prevented, or lives saved, over a given recent decade, to unintended adverse effects?
I am guessing you can't, because I can't, and it's my purview. I could look up the figures, but I don't know them off hand. What I do know is that those ratios are enormously favorable. They are likely in the general domain of millions to one, and reliably well into the many tens-of-thousands to one.
And yet, it's the “one” that makes headlines, and grabs our attention. The number of cases of measles prevented by that vaccine does not make news. The discredited claim that the MMR vaccine causes autism makes news again, and again, and again.
Similarly, we are unlikely to have any idea about most threats of terrorism that never come to fruition. Every now and then we hear about such a threat, interdicted when near to full maturity. But given the nature of prevention, most such crises are surely averted at earlier stages, entirely unconducive to drama. There is no drama, there are no headlines, and we are none the wiser.
We are, of course, unlikely to live in a world where no acts of terrorism take place, now that there are sizable entities with considerable resources dedicated to the perpetration of just such acts. It might be possible to achieve perfect interdiction in a fully militarized state, but the loss of liberty would be far too high a price to pay.
Similarly, we are unlikely to live in a world where civil liberties and privacy are fully unfettered. There are real dangers to contend with here. Were we to renounce all security for the sake of unmitigated liberty for all, we would be taking our lives in our hands at every gathering we attend.
In health and security alike, we are seeking the sweet spot. We are aiming at a ratio of effective prevention to occasional lapse that rightly balances the advantages of interdiction with the costs, sacrifices, and inconveniences with which we are willing to purchase them.
But ratios and balance and realistic compromises are not the stuff of campaign bravado. Nor are they the stuff of headlines, and there are papers to sell and air time to fill every day. Failure of preventive efforts unfailingly gets the spotlight; success is consigned to the shadows.
Consequently, we will certainly know about every act of violence and terrorism that makes it through the existing filters, just as we will know about every screening test or vaccine gone awry. How easy, then, for anyone inclined to demagoguery to point an accusing finger at any evidence of current failure, blame it on those currently in charge, and promise us a world free of it- although invariably without any cogent explanation as to how.
In politics, this is how we tend to roll, and everyone seems to accept it. No doubt far too many are actually persuaded by the captivating combination of misdirected blame, and unsubstantiated promises.
But imagine for a moment if medicine worked this way. With every case of colon cancer, there would be an argument to abandon colon cancer screening altogether since, obviously, it had failed! The occurrence of breast cancer would propagate arguments to abandon mammography, rather than efforts to improve it. Opposing medical factions would blame bad outcomes on one another, and make vague promises about alternative approaches that would provide perfect results. We, the people, would favor first one group, then another, only to be disappointed by each in turn.
Whether in defense of the human body, or of our collective security, the best we can do is the best we can do. It involves tradeoffs between protection of life and limb, and protection of comfort, convenience, and civil liberties.
If inclined to think that someone else should be in charge because those who have been haven't prevented everything bad, ask yourself what you actually know about how much bad stuff has been prevented. The answer, inevitably for those of us without high-level security clearance, is: we don't know much. We might well be living in a world of six-sigma security, yet only know about the one failure in a million.
In my field, news not made by things that haven't happened tends to be what matters most of all. In a troubled, complicated world of terrorist organizations, much the same is apt to be true of our security.
Preventive Medicine invites us to consider the importance of what does not happen, along with that of what does. In so doing, it might help us see past the distortions of political propaganda and false promises of perfect success, to a balanced perspective about balancing priorities, and the best we can do with that reality.
-fin
Director, Yale University Prevention Research Center; Griffin Hospital
President, American College of Lifestyle Medicine
Senior Medical Advisor, Verywell.com
Founder, The True Health Initiative
Follow at: LinkedIN; Twitter; Facebook
Read at: INfluencer Blog; Huffington Post; US News & World Report
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Full Text:
Andrew Barnard, an acoustics engineer from Michigan Tech, watched the sunset and listened to the deepest spot in Lake Superior as part of a chief scientist training with the University-National Oceanographic Laboratory System (UNOLS). UNOLS is run by the National Science Foundation and the Office of Naval Research and maintains all of the US science ship fleet. The vessels are doing great science in far flung regions like the Antarctic. There's also a UNOLS vessel, R/V Blue Heron, operating on the Great Lakes out of University of Minnesota Duluth where Barnard did his chief scientist training.
Image credit: Dr. Andrew R, Barnard, Michigan Technological University
Full Text:
Astronomers have made the first accurate measurement of the abundance of oxygen in a distant galaxy. Oxygen, the third-most abundant chemical element in the universe, is created inside stars and released into interstellar gas when stars die. Knowing the abundance of oxygen in the galaxy called COSMOS-1908 is an important stepping stone toward allowing astronomers to better understand the population of faint, distant galaxies observed when the universe was only a few billion years old and galaxy evolution.
Image credit: Ryan Sanders and the CANDELS team
marco18678 posted a photo:
For more info and stories behind my pictures follow me on facebook .... www.facebook.com/mbontenbal
Igor Sorokin posted a photo:
London, UK
The opening ceremony of the XXXI Olympiad will take place tonight in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The city's newly constructed Olympic Tennis Center and Maria Esther Bueno Court are seen in this shot from aerial photographer @gilesinfo. This particular photo is taken from Morar Olimpíadas, his new book that examines the physical transformation of Rio de Janeiro in the run up to the event. Let the games begin! (at Rio 2016 Summer Olympics)
Sculptor Lil posted a photo:
spencer.wilmot posted a photo:
Ready to push at Terminal 4.
spencer.wilmot posted a photo:
China Southern 787 at Terminal 4.
The Narratographer posted a photo:
Well, I decided to process a lot of the images from my trips across Europe over the last few years. Recently, I haven't done many landscapes and cityscapes, so Ive decided to get back into them.
The main reason for this, is the fact that my best friend, Anthony, has decided to move across the pond to Canada. Best friends since we were 11, he was my travel companion, my ally and my source of inspiration. We spent most of our adult life travelling across the UK, and across Europe, having fun and taking photos. For all those years, we were inseparable, the closest two friends can ever be.
Like I say, a year ago, he decided to move to Canada, to be with a girl he met on Facebook. Now, they have a child and are married...and I haven't seen him since. So all of these images are dedicated to my distant friend. He was with me when I took all of them, and without him, Id have never have taken them. So I just thought that I would post these images, as lately Ive been feeling very nostalgic and sad that we don't get the chance to do these sorts of things anymore. so thanks Ant, for being the best friend anyone could ever wish for. I miss you.
Anyway, I hope you like the images.
Microsoft's recent Artificial Intelligence robot Tay didn't exactly make headlines for the right reasons, after Twitter users somehow managed to trick it into becoming a Nazi. But the computer giant is probably hoping their latest venture will steer clear of any controversy.
Project Murphy is described as a “robot with imagination” - you can talk to it through your Facebook Messenger app and ask it to dream up funny pictures for you.
For example, you could ask Murphy “What if Donald Trump was a fish?” and it would automatically edit the presidential candidate's head onto a sea creature.
Naturally, people are devoting a lot of time to finding the funniest possible combinations.
My best masterpiece so far with #ProjectMurphy. pic.twitter.com/G53KFmaWbE
— Jeremy Nielsen (@Jnn575) July 12, 2016
Идеально #projectmurphy pic.twitter.com/BoB753SQ5z
— Maxim Vakulich (@vma392) July 8, 2016
Having way too much fun with #projectmurphy @ThePoke pic.twitter.com/hpgAjF2fC9
— Tom Nightingale (@Tomn_1986) August 5, 2016
What if Davey Cameron is a pie? #ProjectMurphy pic.twitter.com/ySfvvewwLK
— Ryan Barrell (@RyanBarrell) August 5, 2016
Oh dear. #ProjectMurphy pic.twitter.com/O1pNGzwpTc
— Jason Wilson (@WhizzoUK) August 5, 2016
#ProjectMurphy is easily the best thing Microsoft has done in recent memory. pic.twitter.com/qVR9uBEeMd
— Matt Kremske (@Kremdog28) July 10, 2016
Rather happy with my first question to #ProjectMurphy pic.twitter.com/5s1iHbaOQu
— Jason Wilson (@WhizzoUK) August 5, 2016
#projectmurphy pic.twitter.com/vsNhYGbqEy
— Chris Dyson (@ChrisLDyson) August 5, 2016
"Do you ever sit back and ask yourself what you're doing with your life?" - Saru, 2k16 #ProjectMurphy pic.twitter.com/jGj1mGnmRX
— Animus (@cinderskull) July 25, 2016
#projectmurphy what if Donald Trump was Miley Cyrus? pic.twitter.com/OEPoQULMeb
— Jack (@JackMeeOff) July 22, 2016
#ProjectMurphy is amazing pic.twitter.com/OyTsMcPKHt
— Jeremy Nielsen (@Jnn575) July 12, 2016
#projectmurphy What if Sunderland had an airport - I'm genuinely not sure how to respond to this pic.twitter.com/rt3jGO3EWn
— Chris Swinton (@Keawyeds) August 5, 2016
What does it mean to be you? And how can science unpick the age-old debates around conscious experience? Join us for a journey into the unknown
Ever since Descartes famously split the world into “mind” and “‘matter”, the debate amongst philosophers and thinkers about conscious experience has raged. And with recent advances in brain imaging technologies, scientists now offer a new and exciting viewpoint on this quintessential human phenomenon. But are we any closer to revealing the mechanisms behind it? And can science offer anything other than objective measures? Under the watchful gaze of the cognitive neuroscientist Professor Anil Seth, Ian and Nicola delve into the murky world of consciousness in an attempt to unravel its mysteries. Along the way we meet UCL's Dr Steve Fleming and Professor Christof Koch from the Allen Institute for Brain Science, to hear how experimental practice and theory are tackling this problem head on.
Continue reading...Image by Johannes Jansson, via Wikimedia Commons
What are the keys to longevity? If you ask Dan Buettner, the author of The Blue Zones: Lessons for Living Longer From the People Who've Lived the Longest, he'd list nine key factors. They range from slow down and don't stress out, to have a clear purpose in life, to eat mainly plant based foods and put family first. Nowhere on his list, however, does he suggest sitting down and reading good books.
And yet a new study by researchers at Yale University's School of Public Health indicates that people who read books (but not so much magazines and newspapers) live two years longer, on average, than those who don't read at all. Becca R. Levy, a professor of epidemiology at Yale, is quoted in The New York Times as saying, “People who report as little as a half-hour a day of book reading had a significant survival advantage over those who did not read.” “And the survival advantage remained after adjusting for wealth, education, cognitive ability and many other variables.” Precisely how book reading contributes to increased longevity is not spelled out. You can read the abstract for the new study here.
Follow Open Culture on Facebook and Twitter and share intelligent media with your friends. Or better yet, sign up for our daily email and get a daily dose of Open Culture in your inbox. And if you want to make sure that our posts definitely appear in your Facebook newsfeed, just follow these simple steps.
Related Content:
How to Live to Be 100 and Beyond: 9 Diet & Lifestyle Tips
Study Finds That Reading Tolstoy & Other Great Novelists Can Increase Your Emotional Intelligence
Book Readers Live Longer Lives, According to New Study from Yale University is a post from: Open Culture. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Plus, or get our Daily Email. And don't miss our big collections of Free Online Courses, Free Online Movies, Free eBooks, Free Audio Books, Free Foreign Language Lessons, and MOOCs.
Soooo … I heard Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, age 48, is using the blood of twentysomethings to stay young.
Actually, he's not doing that yet. Reportedly, he's considered receiving blood transfusions from younger people, which he hopes might reverse signs of aging, but he hasn't actually said anything publicly beyond hint that he might be game.
Wait, is that even possible? Sucking in young blood to make yourself younger?
Let's back up a few steps. There's been some exciting, preliminary research in mice that suggests there's something about young blood. In these experiments, scientists have stitched together a young mouse and old mouse so that their circulatory systems are pumping the same blood through each other's veins. This makes tissue stronger in the older mice: repairs spinal cord damage, prompts new brain cells to grow, and “even makes their fur shinier,” writes journalist Megan Scudellari for Nature in a great primer on the research's history.
When these experiments were done in the 1950s, mice sometimes reacted by trying to bite each other's heads off. It was not great. But in modern experiments, they are carefully selected for compatibility and hang out beforehand, which seems to help. They seem to behave normally while sewn together and can even be separated afterward. The older mice might be healthier for it but as Scudellari writes, “no one has convincingly shown that young blood lengthens lives, and there is no promise that it will.”
You'd have to be physically stitched to another person and receiving their blood for this to work?
No, no, obviously not, though that is the method that's shown most of the best results in mice. There's some evidence that repeated injections of plasma will work the same way, too: A 2014 study showed that they improved cognitive function in aging mice. But we would not stitch humans together, no.
Well, what are we doing to humans then?
We're basically trying to figure out if any of this translates to humans. This is all very preliminary, but there are actually a couple companies trying out various methods of the idea that young blood can reduce disease in older patients. Stanford researcher Tony Wyss-Coray, who has long been stitching together mice, founded a company called Alkahest and is carrying out a clinical trial on 18 people with Alzheimer's to see if plasma injections can improve their cognitive function—and, if so, which parts of the plasma are doing the work. The general understanding is that the proteins in young blood have some sort of restorative property, though no one quite understands the mechanism that makes young blood useful.
Another company, Ambrosia LLC, founded by a recently minted Stanford MD, is booting up a clinical trial for anyone over 35 who is aging (aka anyone over the age of 35). (It's this company that attracted the attention of Thiel's health adviser, though there's no sign that Thiel himself has enrolled in the trial.)
In the Ambrosia trial, 600 participants will each receive a liter-and-a-half of blood from someone under 25 over the course of a couple days. Before and after the trial, Ambrosia will analyze various measurements of the participants' health to see if they can assess any change from the infusion.
Where do they get the young blood?
They buy it from blood banks, just like any other hospital would.
OK, I guess that's not that weird. So, I'd like to live longer. How do I sign up?
Whoa, slow down. This will probably not actually extend people's lives. It's not even always effective in mice. In a trial that involved injecting rodents with plasma over the course of 16 weeks, the mice didn't live any longer than a control group injected with saline. There isn't enough research done in humans to know if the small benefits to tissue health transfers, and we do know that mice are not perfect foils for the human body.
“There's just no clinical evidence [that the treatment will be beneficial], and you're basically abusing people's trust and the public excitement around this,” Wyss-Coray told Science magazine of the Ambrosia trial. (Yes, his company could be considered a competitor to Ambrosia, though it doesn't seem like he's selling anything yet.)
Ambrosia's founder Jesse Karmazin, on the other hand, tells me that he finds the evidence from mouse studies along with encouraging results from the few small studies that have been conducted in humans, like Wyss-Coray's, enough to justify his trial.
At any rate, transfusions are very safe when properly supervised, so it's not like he's trying some experimental procedure that could do harm. He is, however, charging participants $8,000.
Seems pretty fair for a shot at longer life, no?
Well, normally, in clinical trials, people are paid for their time and participation, not the other way around. This is actually pretty weird. So weird, in fact, that it's unlikely this trial will result in reputable results able to tell us anything meaningful about blood transfusions.
Taking money from participants is referred to as pay-to-play. While a handful of researchers are trying it, it's rife with ethical issues, many of which University of Pennsylvania medical ethicist Ezekiel J. Emanuel (and co-authors) outlined in an editorial for Science Translational Medicine last year. (They also noted that the method has been favored by “unscrupulous companies and health facilities” looking to turn a profit.)
The reason why this is suspect is because clinical trials are setup to test a treatment as objectively as possible. In fact, the highest standard of clinical trial is one that is placebo-controlled and conducted double-blind. Participants are recruited based on specific criteria—for example, if they all have a disease and are within a certain age range. These participants are randomly assigned to different groups. One of these groups receives a placebo (a sugar pill instead of a drug), so researchers can understand what changes are attributable to the drug itself and what changes are attributable to the theater of the treatment. Patients are put in these groups randomly: Ideally, neither the patient nor the experimenter knows what kind of treatment they're receiving.
Isn't Ambrosia doing that?
Nope. In Ambrosia's trial, all patients appear to be getting the same treatment—there is no placebo set up, so there is nothing to blind. The thinking is that people shelling out eight grand won't accept the terms of a randomized treatment, and the possibility of receiving a mere placebo—the very backbone of a good clinical trial.
The terms of enrollment for Ambrosia's trial are also laughably general. I mean, 35-year-olds aren't exactly elderly. They aren't going to have any diseases associated with aging. As Harvard researcher Amy Wagers told Scudellari in Nature last year, most effective use of young blood will probably be for treating a specific disease, or helping elderly recover from surgery. It's hard to know what kind of measurable effect it might have on a—by all appearances spry—40-something like Thiel.
It also means that Ambrosia's sample is going to be skewed toward people who are can afford the treatment and who self-select to prioritize youth. There's no telling how this sample size may compare to the average person.
Maybe it's not a perfect clinical trial. But won't the people still get something out of it?
Honestly, who knows! The pay-to-play model is potentially very dishonest: Most clinical trials do not work out. This is how science goes. A clinical trial is an experiment, not a service. When scientists set it up like one, it puts patients in a position to be taken advantage of because the treatment being tested probably will not work.
Hmmm. But this is legal and everything?
Yes, technically it is. Blood transfusions are a common, Food and Drug Administrationapproved treatment, and Karmazin has a medical degree, so he can administer them at his discretion.
I asked Karmazin about some criticisms of the pay-to-play model. He wrote in an email that “patients frequently pay for off-label uses of medications, based on physician judgment.” That's true. But the doctor's judgement in this case is rather optimistic. The price is also pretty steep.
I think I'm going to sit this one out and see what they come up with.
That seems best.
What else I can do to live longer?
There are a number of actions you can take that have been shown to extend lifespan, such as eating more vegetables, exercising regularly, or not smoking.
Yeah, yeah, I know.
Joe.Gibson posted a photo:
Part of a project I have set myself to upload a photo for each day for the two weeks that I am off work.
Went to try and catch some shots of the sunset from Royal Hill in Greenwich.
crissudi posted a photo:
crissudi posted a photo:
crissudi posted a photo:
crissudi posted a photo:
crissudi posted a photo:
crissudi posted a photo:
www.matthewcattellphotography.com posted a photo:
A Red Deer Stag in a misty meadow, photographed so that the low morning sun created a halo around its velvet-covered antlers.
Euro airliner firm Airbus is sponsoring a glider capable of soaring to greater altitudes than the famous SR-71 Blackbird spy aircraft.…
Full Text:
We learn a lot about objects by manipulating them: poking, pushing, prodding, and then seeing how they react. We obviously can't do that with videos — just try touching that cat video on your phone and see what happens. But is it crazy to think that we could take that video and simulate how the cat moves, without ever interacting with the real one? Researchers from MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory have recently done just that, developing an imaging technique called Interactive Dynamic Video (IDV) that lets you reach in and “touch” objects in videos. Using traditional cameras and algorithms, IDV looks at the tiny, almost invisible vibrations of an object to create video simulations that users can virtually interact with.
Image credit: Abe Davis/MIT CSAIL
Full Text:
The Yellowstone River in Yellowstone National Park after a late spring snowstorm. Earlier annual snowmelt periods may decrease streamflow and reduce forests' ability to regulate atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study. By mid-century, a shift in snowmelt timing could lead to 45 percent reduction of forest CO2 uptake.
Image credit: Theodore Barnhart
When an earnest undergraduate quizzed the aged E M Forster about the good life, the novelist is supposed to have replied: “Don't ask about the good life. Find out what you enjoy.” I'm not sure of the source of the story, which I've heard in more than one version, but the dictum attributed to the novelist encapsulates a popular type of liberal philosophy. Arguments about the good are unending and inconclusive. Despite Aristotle, Buddha, Laozi and all those who followed them, there is no more agreement on the subject than there was two and a half millennia ago. Given the essential elusiveness of goodness, why not focus on something we can judge with reasonable confidence? After all, we all know what we like. If we stick to what we enjoy, we can hardly go wrong.
The trouble is that, in fact, what we like is often unclear to us. As Tom Vanderbilt writes:
Related: The secret of taste: why we like what we like | Tom Vanderbilt
Continue reading..."I think the Bayindir finds are Phrygian."
"This is a fabulous discovery. I have never seen anything like it. Each and every piece is of purely Phrygian type."
"Thanks Suzan. I've written about this with Keith DeVries in 2012, and we still stand by that."
"Dear Suzan, you may consult the catalog entry of the exhibition Assyria to Iberia, at the Dawn of the Classical Age, edited by Joan Aruz, Sarah B. Graff and Yelena Rakic, New York, 2014, p. 308, nr. 180 with previous references as well as the attached article on the same subject. Should you need any further help, do not hesitate to contact me.
Athanasia"
"Initially attributed to a Greek artist under strong Near Eastern influence, more recently the figurine has been convincingly suggested to have originated from a Phrygian workshop. It has also been proposed that this unique object was made as a decorative attachment for the magnificent throne of Midas. . . ."
"Although it could be argued that stylistic analysis is in the end largely subjective, even a cursory look at the items compared shows no components of the Delphi figure's face (mouth, eyes, etc.) or hair reflect Phrygian features."
"The ivory piece from Delphi, currently on display at the University Museum in Philadelphia, is assuredly not Phrygian [emphasis added], in my opinion, but the product of a west Anatolian or East Greek workshop. The meander is found in Phrygian furniture, but it came to be such a widely used motif that one cannot use it to determine origin. It is a strange piece that I have wondered about for years. The lion, for whatever reason has an erection, for which I know of no parallels."
"That is not an erection!"
"Have you read Brian Rose's 2012 article in The Archaeology of Phrygian Gordion? His comparanda is not convincing[emphasis added], and it is generally acknowledged by colleagues that there is no evidence [emphasis added] that the ivory Lion Tamer statuette is Phrygian in style per se.
The Delphi Museum's posted description [you emailed me] is much more accurate than Rose's contention. Do you know if the Delphi Museum post is official? Is this what the museum label for the Lion Tamer says? Can you please let me know? I am curious.
In terms of the meander design on the base (which is published upside down in Rose's article), this exact pattern is not found on any Phrygian furniture that I know of, and the cross-within-a-square is particularly unusual in that regard.
In terms of form and joinery, the piece was recovered in fragments and has been restored; not all of it is preserved, and I have not seen the bottom of the base. There is a mortise (square cutting) in the back of the figure, but it is shallow, suggesting that the Lion Tamer was not a structural element but decorative. I am not sure how or where the Lion Tamer would have been attached to whatever it once belonged to.
Apart from the style of the ivory figure, the pattern on the base, and its form and joinery, however, one must consider whether the Lion Tamer is from a piece of Phrygian furniture at all -- and whether there is any evidence that it "is" or "may be" from Midas's famous throne.
1. First, a large collection of Phrygian royal furniture survives from the tombs at Gordion, and none of it has carved figures as elements, let alone ivory figures of this sort. You can see what the Gordion furniture looks like from my publications, particularly my 2010 Brill book on the furniture from Tumulus MM (in the MMA library, the Bard Graduate Center library, and elsewhere). A brief summary and bibliography can be found in the Wikipedia article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordion_Furniture_and_Wooden_Artifacts
Although there are no "thrones" from the Gordion tombs, there was a small chair in Tumulus MM, but it has no carved human figures -- only a crest with small animals in panels carved in relief.
There were ancient Near Eastern thrones that had carved human figures (or deities) as elements, but there is no evidence of this from Phrygia. Such figural elements occur initially in the third millennium B.C., and they are found later in Assyria, Urartu, and elsewhere in the first millennium B.C.
Ivory attachments of various types are well known from the second and first millennia in the ANE [Ancient Near East], but ivory attachments are not found on the royal furniture from the Gordion tombs. Several small, square ivory plaques were excavated in association with wood fragments from Megaron 3 on the City Mound at Gordion, but the figures carved in relief on these plaques are Phrygian in style, like those on the crest rail of the chair from Tumulus MM -- and bear no stylistic resemblance to the Lion Tamer from Delphi. You can read about ANE furniture in my article, "Furniture in Ancient Western Asia," here attached.
Rather, the design and decoration of Phrygian royal furniture involved the abstraction of three-dimensional forms, and elaborate inlaid geometric patterns with complex symmetry, including mazes, apotropaic and religious symbols, and "genealogical patterns." Phrygian furniture seems to be completely different from its eastern counterparts. The examples we have are made of wood, typically boxwood inlaid with juniper and walnut, which survived in relatively good condition in several tombs at Gordion.
So, the ivory Lion Tamer is in no way characteristic of Phrygian furniture, in terms of extant evidence. In fact, it looks completely unrelated in this regard.
2. Second, might the Lion Tamer have come from the throne that Midas dedicated in the sanctuary of Apollo at Delphi? Although I suppose it is remotely possible, there is absolutely no evidence for this contention. As already discussed, there is no evidence that the statuette is actually Phrygian, although it may have been made somewhere in Anatolia. And carved figures of this type are not found on Phrygian royal furniture as we know it.
But let's just imagine that Midas did have a throne with carved figures on it. Maybe he imported it from Urartu or Assyria. Even if that were the case, there is no evidence that this particular carved figure came from it [emphasis in original]. Indeed, the Lion Tamer does not look either Assyrian or Urartian, and it is hard to tell exactly where it was made or what it was once attached to.
I do not doubt that Herodotus saw a throne at Delphi that he believed was dedicated by King Midas [Herodotus 1.14). Unfortunately, he does not describe it.
I gave a lecture on April 2, 2016, at the Penn Museum at the conference, "The World of Phrygian Gordion," in which I said all these things. Brian Rose was in attendance, as the convener of the conference. He heard what I said and appeared to acknowledge the cogency of my argument. Nonetheless he continues to stand by his 2012 article.
Oscar[Muscarella]'s source article on the Lion Tamer is very good on the various issues. I also plan to write an article on "Midas's Throne," as it is important that Rose's article not stand unchallenged."
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Looking for a healthy variety of bugs? You might want to try searching in your wealthiest friend's house. Neighborhood income is a good predictor of the number of kinds of bugs in homes.
Nighttime driving restrictions on teens may save lives, a study finds, but should probably be shifted to include late evening. A third of all fatal crashes with teen drivers happen after dark.
www.matthewcattellphotography.com posted a photo:
A Red Deer Stag in a misty meadow, photographed so that the low morning sun created a halo around its velvet-covered antlers.
brady tuckett posted a photo:
Pentacon 30mm f/3.5
The Collecting Traveler posted a photo:
The Collecting Traveler posted a photo:
The Collecting Traveler posted a photo:
The Collecting Traveler posted a photo:
The Collecting Traveler posted a photo:
The Collecting Traveler posted a photo:
The Collecting Traveler posted a photo:
The Collecting Traveler posted a photo:
Seymour Papert was a pioneer in artificial intelligence and learning with technology. He died this week at 88.
Despite a server breached at the DNC and the controversy over Hillary Clinton's private email server, a prominent cybersecurity expert say she's the better choice for president.
DraftKings and FanDuel suspended operations there after the state's attorney general argued they were essentially gambling sites. A new state law declares fantasy sports to be games of skill.
A Hillary Clinton fundraiser will take place at BlackHat in Las Vegas. Cybersecurity experts there say they support her over Donald Trump despite all the controversy over her email server.
The Vacuum Cleaner Museum in St. James, Mo., houses more than 750 vacuums, including some that date back to just after the Civil War. Curator Tom Gasko is a former door-to-door vacuum salesman.