“Chemotherapy kills” was bound to pique our interest, especially since in the best traditions of modern research, its source was a badly-reported scientific study.…
Back in 1991, fresh from reading George Stewart's magnificent science fiction novel “Earth Abides”, I started an eighth-grade science assignment with the quote from Ecclesiastes Stewart begins the book with:
“One generation passeth away and another generation cometh but the earth it abideth forever”
To this I added:
“Not if the human race can help it, though.”
Inspired by a recent article in Time magazine about global warming, I had written a Ted Kaczynski-esque withering assault on modern civilization and advocated a reversal (yes, LOL indeed) of industrialization. It was a thoroughly godawful paper and I have little doubt that George Stewart was the only thing that got me a passing grade on it.
It was straight from the heart though, and not since then has my interest and passion in what we have done to this planet waned. As someone who tries to keep track of the impact of human-induced climate change, I have always found baffling the lack of importance the issue has received as an electoral issue. There is no greater threat to our safety and well being-no ifs, ands, or buts about it. We are a species that like any other, requires a habitat that can sustain our biological functions and allow the vegetation and animal life necessary to sustain our food supply. The manifest reality of today is that our habitat is under attack from our own creations. We have polluted our air and our oceans. We have doomed to extinction countless species of plants and animals many of whom we may have annihilated before they could be discovered. The earth is warming quicker and sea levels are rising faster than any prediction model foresaw. Literally hundreds of small island communities ― as well as major nations like Bangladesh and Indonesia ― are already losing shorelines and even arable land. In America, with our over 10,000 miles of shoreline, climate scientists predict a rise in sea levels and markedly increased flooding in coastal cities like New York within the next five decades.
This is not a problem of the future, it is a problem of the here and now and a catastrophe beyond biblical proportions in the making.
Jill Stein is the first presidential candidate in American history to make climate change the centerpiece of her campaign. Her plan to address climate change is the most comprehensive and consistent over the years of any Presidential candidate. Her plan aims to make clean energy a major focus of her economic plan and she states in her manifesto:
“The environment and the economy are interdependent―they are not at odds with each other. In order to have a prosperous economy, you need to have the healthy environment to support it: for energy, for food, and for other aspects. The idea that they're pitted against each other is a concoction of misinformation from those who exploit the environment. We allow them to exploit the environment at our own peril, as we see from everything from air pollution and its health impact, to water shortages, to flooding, to extreme storms. These are not just happening in the Third World: we are beginning to pay the price for this very misguided, short-term, short-sighted exploitation of the environment.”
With such beautiful simplicity, Dr. Stein makes a point no one else is making. A cleaner environment and actions to protect our country and planet from climate change are not, and must not, be construed as being anathema to our economy. They are a necessary challenge on which the future of everything, including the economy, rests.
Dr. Stein wants to empower the EPA and cleanse it of all political and corporate influence. She wants to invest money not into bailing out our predatory banks and perpetually failing automobile industry but into clean energy and green technology. She envisions a major creation of green jobs including constructing green infrastructure, retrofitting homes, sustainable food and agricultural practices and increasing recycling.
I find Jill Stein to be the only Presidential candidate with the passion and sense of urgency necessary to combat human-induced climate change and other ongoing environmental damage. I cannot imagine voting for a man who has called global warming a Chinese conspiracy and climate change a hoax. I cannot vote for a woman who has corporate ties so prolonged and so deep that she cannot be trusted to operate independent of lobbyist influence on any issue including climate change.
A vote for Jill Stein is a vote for the future of this country and this planet. Let us no longer lead the world in war and corporate greed. Let us no longer pretend to the throne of the world and wax eloquent about our golden principles while violating them in every corner of the globe. Let us instead lead the world by example. And in this, let us start with the most crucial issue of all-protecting and preserving our habitat.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Different researches and real time experiences confirm that climate change has direct impact on access to and management of water for drinking and agriculture purpose in Pakistan. The country is hit hard due to recurring climate catastrophes. Women are at the center of these impacts due to their inequitable access to water and land rights and decision making.
Climate Scientists recommend the world take serious actions to limit emission of greenhouse gases and keep the average global temperature below 1.5°C. This is vital to prevent humanity from climate crisis. In case of Pakistan, even before reaching this threshold, water crisis in the region is already at alarming level. Pakistan by no means can afford the world cross the safe limit of 1.5°C and increase its vulnerabilities manifold.
Declining water as a serious threat to human life in Pakistan: In December 2013, the World Resources Institute ranked Pakistan among the 36 most water-stressed countries in the world. Data from the Water and Power Development Authority of Pakistan indicates in 1951 per capita water availability was 5,650 cubic meters. By 2010, that figure shrank to 1,000 cubic meters and it is set to fall to 800 cubic meters by 2025, when Pakistan's population rises to 221 million. Alarmingly, groundwater levels in the country are dropping by a meter a year. With this rate, Pakistan is heading towards widespread water poverty in next few years.
According to Water Aid, 16 million people in Pakistan have no choice but to collect unsafe water from unsafe sources. 68 million people don't have access to adequate sanitation in Pakistan. Around 39,000 children under five die every year from diarrhoea caused by unsafe water and poor sanitation in Pakistan.
Water-stressed agriculture: Nearly 70% of Pakistan's 291 millimeters of annual rainwater gets wasted because of poor storage facilities. Agriculture accounts for 24% of the total GDP of Pakistan. 68% of its geographical area has annual rainfall of 250mm whereas only 8% of the areas have annual rainfall of 500mm. To meet the food production need, the country thus requires supplemental water for better crops production. The contribution of Agriculture in GDP growth rate has significantly declines from 50% in 1929-50 to about 24% in 196-97. By the year 2050, the urban population of Pakistan is expected to reach 63.7% as compared to only 36 percent in 2010. Rapid increase in population will lead to overwhelming pressure on water supply both for households and agriculture needs.
Women, the most vulnerable: Women face the brunt of climate crisis more than anyone else in the society. Inequitable power relationship, lack of access to different resources like water and land rights, information and training keep women more vulnerable in the face of growing impacts of climate change. Women are often at receiving end by the policy makers and strategists rather than being empowered to find their own solutions and actions to find sustainable water solutions.
Women faces numerous challenges, however natural disasters and conflicts in Pakistan doubles the risks that women face. They have limited access to assets, income and information and their limited mobility restrict them respond to disasters, unlike men. In the agriculture sector, women are disproportionately employed. When disasters hit like flooding, large number of population gets displaced which triggers case of gender based violence and other abuses. In addition, living in displaced settings, women have to travel more to fetch water and collect food and woods as distance between their settlements and source of water increased. Studies from the Asian Development Bank shows that targeted interventions in rural development projects have significantly contributed in women's empowerment. Another study found that if water is available at household level in some rural communities, families can save as much as 1,200 hours per year.
This analysis simply tells a straightforward story - keep the world under 1.5 Degree threshold as this is the utmost need of countries like Pakistan and its citizens who would otherwise fight for their dignity and search of water to drink and survive.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Over the next several days, delegates from over 170 countries will gather in Hawaii for the IUCN World Conservation Congress. The theme of this year's Congress is “a planet at risk.” Exaggerated droughts and floods, reduced regional water supplies, and ever-longer wildfire seasons, make it clear we are overdue for major conservation organizations to apply strong focus to combatting global warming and its dangerous climate change symptoms. Yet, just as in other recent conservation conferences I have attended, agenda topics at this Conservation Congress seem focused on traditional “on the ground” conservation tools like anti-poaching efforts and setting aside protected areas of habitat.
Climate change is the single biggest issue the world faces, with ramifications for generations to come. While traditional conservation efforts remain important, no conservation plan is complete without simultaneous efforts to stop this overarching threat.
Some conservationists seem to think this is an “either/or” situation, or that there is a competition between addressing global warming and implementing on the ground strategies. Nothing could be farther from the truth. If we don't stop elephant poaching soon, there will be no elephants left for global warming to kill. Conversely, if we don't act soon to address climate change, the boundaries of new elephant reserves will no longer enclose the ecosystems they were designed to protect. Clearly, we need traditional on the ground efforts and rapid efforts to reduce our use of fossil fuels. And, because we cannot fight global warming in the field, efforts to combat it must take place independently of ongoing efforts applied on the ground.
Combatting climate change requires a united front of conservationists and humanitarians to inform, enlighten, and inspire our policy leaders to take necessary action. This “enlightenment” can be done at the same time funds are focused on battling poachers.
For many concerned conservationists, climate change seems an uncertain and distant challenge. But there is no uncertainty in the ultimate threat. The laws of physics require the world to continue to warm as long as atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations rise. If we don't stop GHG rise soon, all of our on the ground conservation efforts will have been for naught.
By the latter part of this century, for example, mean annual temperatures across most of Africa and the Middle East will be nearly 5°C warmer than now, and summer temperatures in most latter years of this century will be hotter than any summer ever recorded. We don't need computer models to appreciate that those conditions will result in human malnutrition on an unprecedented scale, and we know from experience that hungry people cannot do conservation. At the end of this century, between widespread famine and refugee problems that dwarf anything yet seen, governments will be too busy dealing with humanitarian issues to care about conserving polar bears or rhinos.
Yet, I continue to be dismayed by statements like “we don't have the mandate to address greenhouse gas emissions” or “we are a research organization, and pushing for climate action is beyond our purview.” Such statements are like turning up the volume on your car's radio so you cannot hear a bad noise coming from the engine.
At the December 2015 Climate Talks in Paris nearly all nations of the world agreed that failure to stop GHG rise soon would assure numerous global extirpations and other future problems for all species, including humans. One unrecorded outcome from Paris was that avoiding the most dangerous of climate change effects is only likely if we adopt an international price for carbon emissions. Voluntary efforts simply will not get us to the Paris goals.
This week, the World Conservation Congress has an opportunity to carry the Paris momentum forward with a full force push for a fair carbon price. Such a call from the World Conservation Congress could help unite the voices of people concerned about conserving everything from coral reefs to polar bears. That united voice could become an important tool needed to stop the ever-louder noise coming from Earth's engine compartment. I hope the World Conservation Congress will build that tool instead of cranking up the volume on the radio.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Listen online here, or Download MP3 (6 mins)...
Link:Embed:
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Read more: Barack Obama, Carbon Emissions, Climate Change, Climate Change Denial, Conservation, Energy, Environment, Fossil Fuels, Global Warming, Global Warming Deniers, Green, Green News, Green News Report, Hawaii, Marine Life, Oceans, Public Lands, Renewable Energy, Video, g20, China, Paris Agreement, Lake Tahoe, Jerry Brown, Extreme Weather, Hurricanes, Insurance, Green News
primulmeusarut posted a photo:
What an amazing way to start September!...
See how initiatives like Cumari: From Rainforest to Table are trying to drum up extra recognition - and income - for Latin America's forest stewards:
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Greg Gard posted a photo:
Adult Peregrine Falcon in flight as seen from above
Please help to continue the preservation of New Jersey's threatened and endangered wildlife by supporting work of Conserve Wildlife Foundation: www.conservewildlifenj.org/getinvolved/donate/
Photograph captured with a Canon EOS 1DXII and 600mm lens
If you are interested in seeing more of my Peregrine Falcon photographs, please visit my gallery: www.greggard.com/falcons
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
andy.gittos posted a photo:
The view from Greenwich Park at Sunset
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.